Archive: Author: Keri O'Shea

Fantastic Fest 2025: Coyotes

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

Coyotes (2025) opens in the most affluent part of LA, the bit near the big letters, and in so doing wastes no time establishing a tone for what’s to come: money and means are going to come into crashing conflict with a highly unlikely, but entertaining series of events.

We start with influencer Kat (Katherine McNamara) and her matching-outfit little dog, clearly signposted as victims-in-waiting when Kat pauses to take a selfie whilst walking said chihuahua and picks up a drooling, growling coyote in the frame (the coyotes look more like wolves, but what do I know? I’m from the UK; most of our animal fatalities are caused by cows). However, as with much of the rest of the film, the surprisingly enraged and intelligent coyotes often end up working in tandem, accidentally or otherwise, with other phenomena. Kat isn’t with us long (sorry, but this happens within minutes), dispatched by a hit and run driver as she runs from a coyote, only to then get partially eaten by a coyote.

Oh. So who else lives around here? Meet family man Scott (fan favourite Justin Long), whose minimalistic and no doubt very expensive home is apparently being plagued by rats in the walls; we meet him as eccentric exterminator, Devon, is suggesting that only the fullest response possible can really get rid of rats. Wife Liv (Kate Bosworth) and teenage daughter Chloe (Mila Harris) are, at that moment, more concerned by an incoming storm; we also hear about the recent wildfires which have been terrifying the residents of LA.

We have a few big possibilities for a crisis here then, although – given the title and the pre-credits sequence above – we happen to know which will dominate. The other unfortunate incidents simply provide added pressure, making escape more or less impossible and by necessity holing up a number of wacky neighbours in their respective houses, ready for their home invasion scenarios. Again, it’s quite clear that not all of the people we meet will be around at the end. We can be okay with that, even whilst pondering that way that no one seems to close doors in this universe; you’ve heard of open plan living, well. This film has an extreme version.

Coyotes takes a little time establishing what it clearly can’t wait to do: picking people off in a range of increasingly gory ways whilst simply enjoying being a creature feature. Sure, the characters initially feel quite thinly-drawn, right down to the feckless father and ‘keeping it all together’ mom who are our main focus, but of course this film doesn’t really need to be a sensitive character study. It just needs to get its pieces into play and to give us just enough to believe in. By using a range of techniques such as a knowing script, a building pace, props, split screen and a range of self-referential moments, it is soon able to launch into the action proper. Whilst coyotes are (as yet) underused as agents of human destruction in cinema, the film is still a grab-bag of familiar elements, drawn from a pretty encyclopaedic knowledge of genre cinema, much of which is made clear to the audience.

There are some weaker aspects here, however. Firstly, it’s always feels off when independent films make free use of clips from Night of the Living Dead, bearing in mind what happened to that film and why, exactly, it never made money for its own director. On the other side of the spectrum, some of the SFX/CGI work in Coyotes looks awfully like AI. If it isn’t AI, then the resemblance is unfortunate and will likely draw some fire, because some of the FX here undoubtedly has an Unreal Engine vibe which will emphatically not be for everyone.

If you are happy to look past this though, then it’s all good. You could suggest that there’s some social or environmental commentary going on, but if so it’s pretty light-touch in the mix. The film on the whole is a quirky, grisly tale of improbable perils and a likely crowd pleaser – particularly for a festival crowd, which makes its premiere at Fantastic Fest a sound choice. Sure, there are familiar notes and tropes being used, but for anyone with room in their hearts for something midway between Cocaine Bear and Day of the Animals, then Coyotes has more than enough to offer.

Coyotes (2025) received its premiere at Fantastic Fest and receives a general release on October 3rd.

Ash (2025)

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

Ash (2025) is, for the most part, as much about thoughts, impressions and experiences as it is a conventional piece of narrative film. It comes in like a space-age fever dream, all body horror and blaring noise, before pausing on the lone, prone figure of Riya (Eiza González), injured and amnesic on the floor of a remote space station. Something catastrophic has happened: the computer keeps on euphemistically intoning that “abnormal activity” has been detected, though it’s some time before Riya sees the worst of whatever went down during her unexplained unconsciousness. There are bodies – the bodies of the rest of the crew, seemingly dispatched in a range of graphically cruel ways.

Directed by Flying Lotus – who also directed one of the chapters in the horribly laboured portmanteau film V/H/S/99 – Ash is, thankfully and appropriately, worlds apart from the earlier offering. The first impression is that the director saw and enjoyed Blade Runner 2049 in all its sumptuously colourful, brooding intensity and thought: yeah, how do we do that, only more? The result is, even if we’re only talking aesthetics, a triumph. We follow Riya as she explores first the station, then the barren, volcanic vista outside. Sensory overload is starting to kick in even before the opening title appears, so it’s a brief relief to get some flashback scenes, meeting the still living crew back before whatever horrors which occurred in this place.

The film feels deliberately written to be intense and lonely; González, thriving in a film which never gets too heavy on the dialogue, is more than up to the role, though things change very suddenly when another crew member appears. Working in orbit until now, Brian (Aaron Paul) is responding to a distress call, so he arrives expecting the worst, and duly receives it. Whilst his presence helps to some extent to fill in the blanks – it turns out it was Riya, for example, who actually made the distress call – it also prompts Riya to reveal that she can’t really remember anything. Not just in terms of the deaths of the crew; she can’t remember where she is, or who she is. Brian tries to reassure her that this kind of soul-searching has long been a part of her personality, but it’s small comfort to a young woman intermittently plagued with half-glimpsed memories and a building sense of trauma. She does, though, keep coming back to one idea: Clarke (Kate Elliot), whose body seems to be missing, may just be the one behind all of this.

Maybe, maybe not; nothing is real out here, except one fact which Brian is keen to press home: the station is irreparably damaged, and they need to leave if they’re going to survive. Taking some cues from the hostile planets of other sci-fi universes – clearly, terraforming is a mug’s game and it shouldn’t be attempted – they only have a brief window in which they can take off to safety. The mystery of the station may need to remain unsolved; Riya finds this idea impossible. She has to know what happened if she’s to move on, or even if she’s to find some peace of mind within herself.

Ash strives to balance its more spiritual concerns, if we can call them that, with a broader and more familiar plotline of exploration and settlement against the odds. This does mean that in places, the balance feels somewhat awry – not quite an existential tale, not quite a conventional tale – but Ash definitely rallies itself, setting aside its comparatively minor thematic and pacing issues to drive towards an assured and grisly, if increasingly familiar-feeling plot shift. As well as a successful and largely satisfying bigger picture, it also does well on the minor details. It’s hard not to mention Blade Runner again here, though the 1982 one this time: such as, the use of spoken Japanese by machines used by an English-speaking team, which is a puzzler, but also an engaging contrast with the tech which makes use of it, tech which is a mix of barbarous and quaintly functional, even oddly archaic. It’s even funny in places. Prometheus (2012) couldn’t do funny (at least on purpose).

There are arguably lots of sci-fi influences on Ash: moments or ideas from games like Starfield, films like Dead Space and Moon and even TV episodes such as The Very Pulse of the Machine can all be charted in this film, which, if nothing else, shows that it has a lot of independently excellent and diverse influences altogether, or that it is channelling similar, complex ideas. In places, perhaps Ash casts its net a little wide, but it has so many superb qualities that it hardly matters, come the end. It’s so startlingly beautiful, for one thing, that you can forget any minor concerns over its more obtuse elements – and then, its finesse and vision more than carry it to its ending. The more I think about it, the more it feels like this could be a cult classic in waiting, and a film which will eventually garner an enthusiastic fan following.

Ash (2025) is available to stream on Shudder.

Traumatika (2024)

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

We have an unusual and specific start point in Traumatika (2024): Egypt, 1910. A man crosses a stretch of desert, clutching something he clearly wants to bury and forget, as he’s haunted by visions of his deceased son. This death – this murder – is linked to the object he’s carrying, a statuette of a pagan entity known as Volpaazu (relative of Pazuzu, maybe).

You get the distinct impression that the buried item will somehow find its way out of the sands of Egypt, and you’d be entirely right, at least to judge by what we first see once we have moved forward to our next chapter: California, 2003. We listen to a child making a 911 call, begging for help because his ‘mother is a monster’. He’s not wrong; it’s moments before we get this idea. Abigail (Rebekah Kennedy), as she stalks around the dilapidated, shadowy property, is terrifying: there’s no question permitted here. Covered in blood, gore and sores, scuttling around like a woman possessed, it turns out she is, in fact, a woman possessed.

Director Pierre Tsigaridis has form for these kinds of deliberately overblown horror spectacles, even if we can accept that, in Traumatika, he is reaching for far more emotive and emotional subject matter along the way. Two Witches (2012) was one big love letter to Sam Raimi and the excesses of supernatural-tinged gore, the kind of thing you either adore or abhor. Here, he has unashamedly done it again, this time invoking demonic possession in all its screeching, laughing, crawling glory, albeit forging interesting links between demons, sacrifice and contagion, which makes for a more than acceptable horror premise. Rebekah Kennedy starred in Two Witches too, and here she’s back, cementing her reputation as a damn fine genre actress, giving a lot to the role – whether this be the crazy physicality necessary, or the emotional vulnerability. The latter is important, because there’s more at play here than a relatively simple story of artefact-derived madness.

The film backfills its occult story with a story of family trauma, with the demonic entity handily finding purchase in a family already steeped in trauma and abuse. It’s deliberately grim and challenging in places, and an obvious criticism to level here is that the more emotive aspects can feel like an uncomfortable fit in places: intergenerational trauma married to the film’s relentless kind of splatter (particularly in the film’s first half) might not sit well with everyone. Personally, the film’s relentless early pace allows little time for these concerns, and personally, its good, even great qualities are enough to hold things together.

Whilst the fact that 2003 is presented here as a remote, historical era (right down to the Skinamarink-style retro kids TV footage) is a little galling, Traumatika has a lot to give. It’s a gory, violent, colourful, beautifully-shot, thumping great clout of a film, giving an initial dose of sensory overload which helps to set out its stall; perhaps the final leap forward to the present day is a leap too far for the modest eighty minute runtime, but it only starts to drift a little towards its close. What has come before can sustain it. It utilises a range of shooting styles, with the child’s eye view a particularly effective (and unsettling) motif, and there are great, horror-friendly sets throughout, good performances and a genuine sense of everyone being fully on board.

So whilst Traumatika is sometimes cluttered, sometimes a little free-falling, it’s only occasional, and it’s hard to deny Tsigaridis’s zeal and affection for the horror genre. He has striven to do more here by building on Two Witches, linking (surprisingly given the title) trauma with his more expected OTT elements, whirling us through a decently made and, in places, ambitious film.

Traumatika (2024) opened in select theatres (US) on September 12th.

Darkest Margins is coming soon – check out our crowdfunder

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

For those of you who still have affection for print media – and why on earth wouldn’t you? – Darkest Margins: 24 Essays on Liminality and Liminal Spaces in the Horror Genre is a completed and upcoming project to watch. Cards on the table: I’m fortunate enough to have a chapter included in the book, because I’m not one to waste an opportunity to talk about The Blood on Satan’s Claw (amongst other titles), particularly from the perspective of…actually, take a look at the link itself, if you would like to find out more. That way, you can also read about all the other essays included, covering such diverse subject matter as Dario Argento’s Inferno, Flatliners, The Blair Witch Project, Hellraiser, Yellowjackets, Skinamarink, I Saw the TV Glow and many more.

The focus of the book is the idea of liminal space – those ambiguous, disorientating places and states which have proven so vital and important in the horror genre. Liminality is a broad church and this is represented through the sheer range of essays, across TV, film, literature, art and video gaming, as well as across geographical, anthropological and psychological spaces. The tone is academic, but all of the contributors are fans first and foremost – meaning detailed, analytical but always enthusiastic perspectives.

The idea behind the crowdfunder is simply to help cover the print costs whilst offering a number of perks – each linked to a specific chapter – which you will then receive alongside your copy of the book itself. Everything from stickers to comic books to art prints to eerie children’s toys are available; simply pick the perk you like the best, and it’ll be included with your copy of the book. There are some other perks available: Darkest Margins editor and contributing writer Matt Rogerson is also offering the chance to pick up a bundle deal including his two other books to date: The Vatican vs Horror Movies and his newest, Fulci’s Inferno: Faith in the Films of a Horror and Giallo Auteur. Included in this bundle deal will be a copy of my brand-new forthcoming book Celluloid Hex: The Witch in Horror and Genre Cinema, which I’ll be posting about in more detail soon.

There are a range of perks to choose from, dependent on budget and preference: why not click on the link and take a look? Your support is massively appreciated and Matt, 1428 Publishing and the writing team can’t wait to bring this book to its audience. Thank you.

Here’s a link to the crowdfunder itself…

And here’s a link to the 1428 Publishing social media account, which is probably the easiest place to find out more.

Celluloid Screams 2025 is coming!

Posted on by Keri O'Shea
Deathstalker

After the notable outlier that is London’s FrightFest, the autumn is when a large share of the UK’s horror and genre film festivals tend to get going. And, in its usual late October slot, Sheffield-based fest Celluloid Screams has recently announced its full 2025 programme, with weekend passes about to go on sale (midday on Saturday 13th September). As ever, it looks great: the festival will be showing a blend of home-grown and world cinema, mystery grindhouse, classic horrors and a sizeable roster of short films (which often wind up being my favourite films of any festival).

Before mentioning some of my own highlights from the programme, it might be useful to mention a few points about Celluloid Screams which might sway people who are interested, but don’t know Sheffield very well. Firstly, if you don’t drive, the venue for the festival is about two minutes’ walk from Sheffield’s main railway station, or a couple of minutes longer from the bus station. There’s reasonably priced parking, lots of cheap places to eat within walking distance of the venue, or a decent cinema café serving alcohol, coffee and meals. There are lots of hotels nearby, some of them budget, and the passes/tickets themselves are very reasonable, considering a weekend pass will also get you into all the extra events – speakers, exhibitions and so on (more below). If you’ve heard of the festival but ‘never got around to it’ for any reason, it’s well worth a look and it’s hosted by a friendly, knowledgeable bunch who have been at it for years – you really couldn’t ask for a better crew or a nicer, more appreciative audience.

Onto the programme…

Queens of the Dead

This year, the festival’s opening gala screening is none other than Tina Romero’s first feature Queens of the Dead. If her father enjoyed giving screentime to various and quite diverse zombified members of the public (I’ll always wonder about that Hare Krishna guy), then Tina Romero has gone a little further by placing her take on a zombie outbreak at the doors of a drag show at a Brooklyn nightclub. On a similar note, and one of the most fun, noteworthy spins on the zombie genre in its own right, the festival will also be showing Return of the Living Dead in honour of its fortieth anniversary: if Tar Man doesn’t get a round of applause, I’ll be very surprised…

There are other classics: look out for Seventies portmanteau horror in the form of Tales From The Crypt (with Joan Collins proving she was every bit a horror starlet before she dedicated her time to soap opera) and – yes, it’s nearly twenty years old – there’s a 4K restoration of Pascal Laugier’s raw, philosophical and bloodily divisive Martyrs. There will also be a mystery 35mm grindhouse screening just before midnight on Saturday – last year it was Pieces, so that gives an idea of the type of film which tends to occupy this slot…

New titles include Mother of Flies, the newest title by festival alumni The Adams Family – with John and Lulu Adams around to introduce their film and host a Q&A after the screening. Witchcraft on film – and what is arguably a newer, more savage renaissance of this subject matter in the past decade or so, is of particular interest to this writer, so the Adams family take on the topics of illness, magic and belief can’t come soon enough.

There’s more uncanny and disquiet in Kier-La Janisse’s The Occupant of the Room (based on a classic story by Algernon Blackwood), and a discussion with the director and writer herself afterwards.

Heading into more modern horror terrain, Man Finds Tape (directed by Paul Gandersman and Peter S. Hall) offers a spin on the modern horror fascination with recorded footage, particularly analogue footage – as siblings discover a series of mysterious video recordings which suggest a disturbing secret, threatening their Texas town.

There’s also been a big uptick in sensory horror of late, from Birdbox to The Undertone, and the UK premiere of Noise (directed by Kim Soo-jin) a character with a hearing impediment, haunted by sounds which seem to relate to her sister’s disappearance.

Mother of Flies

If you prefer a bit more fantasy and OTT fare then the name ‘Steven Kostanski’ alone should do you; this year, his new title, the fantasy epic Deathstalker will be screening. There’ll also be a new instalment of unintentionally-hilarious Public Information films in the form of Scared Safe Vol. 2 (the festival ran a compilation of PIFs a decade ago, and oh god, they’ve found a load more!)

The closing gala this year belongs to festival favourite Julia Ducournau, whose film Titane took off the roof when it screened four years ago. This year, her new feature Alpha promises to follow another uniquely troubled teen on her own path to reckoning – and it’s sure to be an experience. Will it be divisive? Almost certainly, given the discourse and discussion already out there. Will it be worth seeing and experiencing? Absolutely.

Alpha

This is of course just a snapshot: head over the festival website now to check out the complete programme and for those all-important festival passes, you need the Showroom Cinema site – with day passes and individual tickets going on sale later. Happy purchasing!

The Balconettes (2024)

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

The Balconettes (2024) is an odd customer. It perhaps starts with the title, a slightly clunky translation of the French title, Les femmes au balcon – choosing a word which may indeed mean ‘women on the balcony’ but is more likely to conjure the word ‘bra’ for most Anglophone audiences. It’s not the last time that the film seems to foreground undies, when it really ought to be focusing on its more serious points more seriously – but we’ll get to that.

The film is set in Marseilles; there’s a heatwave, and we start with the camera roving over some apartment frontages, looking at the residents trying to keep cool. It lingers on a woman called Denise, who was flat out on her own balcony until her loutish husband decided to hurl water over her to get her up on her feet: he’s ‘hungry’, and apparently unable to fend for himself. Denise sees red at this intrusion – clearly this is the final straw – and decides to deck her hubby with a heavy iron dustpan, making sure to finish the job. This, by the by, is only briefly relevant: Denise may have been au balcon, but she’s not a balconette.

Instead we have Nicole (Sanda Codreanu), a struggling writer; Ruby (Souheila Yacoub), a free spirit/camgirl, and Élise (also director and co-writer Noémie Merlant), an actress, who spends a share of the film dressed as Marilyn Monroe, after hurtling from Paris to Marseille to get away from her overbearing husband. The three young women enjoy being reunited, drinking and dining on the balcony of their apartment. While they’re out there, they start communicating with the Hot Guy From Opposite who has, unbeknownst to him, already started to become the inspiration for Nicole’s new novel.

Despite the brief outbreak of violence at the start of the film – and Denise (Nadège Beausson-Diagne) doesn’t really spend much time with the other women, save for popping in and jokily confessing her crime to an equally jovial Nicole – The Balconettes endures a painfully quirky start, all told. The giggly reunion, the unspoken crushes, the mild voyeurism and the colourful underwear airing everywhere (this is a very knicker-rich environment) all suggest a romcom kind of affair, and when the girls are finally invited over to Hot Guy’s apartment opposite, the giggling and the drinking continue. However, the better they get to know the Hot Guy From Opposite, who turns out to be a photographer, the more things start to become complicated. He asks to photograph Ruby; she agrees; she stays behind – and the film takes a much darker turn.

The Balconettes could easily withstand this about-face, and to an extent it does, but things dwindle here, as each woman separates and goes her own way for a while. Issues occur as the film elects to park the mystery of that fateful night, leaving us with a negative space in the film which takes up time and pace before handing down even the most basic answers. Even if you can guess what’s going on, it still feels like it runs out of steam. It elects to provide more backstory for some of the characters, which is why we get this shift in pace, but in the main this means presenting all of the men – with the exception, also somewhat quirkily, of a kindly gynaecologist – as comic obstacles at best, but more likely stroppy, overbearing and terminally horny monsters. This isn’t without precedent, in film or in discourse more broadly, but given the ways in which the film drifts further and further into big, uncomfortable topics, the film’s colourful, idiosyncratic approach sits uncomfortably at times. There’s feminine bonding and clashing fashions; then there’s gore, there’s splatter, there’s some surprisingly explicit content, and then it goes from realist moments to outright supernatural fantasy; the film is both diffuse in places, and yet very crowded more generally.

For all that – and for all of the genre-straddling goings-on, which will almost certainly make it harder for this film to find a large and receptive audience – there’s enough bizarre energy and ambition here to make The Balconettes oddly, dementedly appealing in enough ways for me to say: it’s somehow impossible to really dislike it. It’s eccentric, overdrawn, and at its worst it makes light of male-on-female violence, which is a tough sell. But its acid colour aesthetics, its great locations and sets, its moments of real warmth between friends and its attempts to combine horror, comedy and Millennial liberation speak at least to big aspirations on the part of Merlant, who’s guilty of throwing a lot at this one, but not of playing it safe, at least. Are the fart jokes a bridge too far? Maybe. But whilst The Balconettes is uneven, it’s charming, and weaving that kind of charm together counts for a good deal.

HollyShorts selection: four titles

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

It’s great that HollyShorts is around: the more festivals we have covering the world of short genre film, the better. As an example of the kinds of films they have featured this year, here are just four titles: each diverse, but each compelling examples of the short film format.

First up is Halfway Haunted, which starts with a woman practicing for a job interview, running through what she’s going to say, making sure she feels ready for the big day. However, there are some issues: first of all, there’s a huge pool of blood seeping through the ceiling. Then her bottle floats into the air, before smashing on the ground. Oh, and did I mention the severed head in the fridge? Yep, Jess (Hannan Younis) lives in a haunted house, although she seems strangely used to it, and more annoyed than terrified.

Things kick up a gear when the property gets sold out from under her and she has to suddenly contend with a brand new, smiling assassin of a landlord called Stephanie (Sugar Lyn Beard). Stephanie wants Jess gone so she can bulldoze and redevelop the place, but Jess isn’t really in a position to find a new place right now. However, if Jess is reluctant to let these kinds of changes take place, then so – it seems – is the ghost.

This is one of those quirky takes on the afterlife which does more than enough to keep things interesting, with a sharp script, suitable pace and diverse moments of humour, making smart points about class, wealth and housing whilst never losing sight of the fun fantasy elements at play. Stephanie is a great villain, Jess is a worthy protagonist, and everything else which director Samuel Rudykoff finds time to show to us works well with the whole. There are twists and turns, too, so you can’t get too comfortable with what you expect is going to happen.

Then there’s a period piece titled The Pearl Comb: it’s a very different beast, though it, too – coincidentally – offers a take on the supernatural, though more with specific folklore in mind. The film starts in Cornwall, 1893: a young doctor named Lutey (also director Ali Cook) is visiting a relative, a woman named Betty (Beatie Edney) who has made the grand claim to have cured a case of consumption – then an incurable and progressive disease which laid waste to people of all walks of life. Dr. Lutey is of course intrigued, but he detects issues with Betty’s story and with her apparent ability to cure the sick. She explains that she owes her abilities to her late husband. Before his passing, he nursed her for an ailment of her own, but a strange encounter one day saw him seduced into a strange bargain with a mysterious creature.

Much of the film belongs to Betty’s husband – known simply as Lutey (Simon Armstrong) – and the events which befell him. The film looks amazing, with meticulous, painterly period detail, just the right amount of fantastical CGI to world-build what is revealed to Lutey as perhaps real, perhaps fantasy, and a great set of actors, who look like they lived these parts. The Pearl Comb offers a vivid and engaging version of a well-known kind of folk tale, but it does more than that too – bringing in aspects of magic vs realism, gender and agency. It’s a sublime spin on the short film format, and another example of how much can be done with such a short runtime.

Next up is a film titled Plastic Surgery: it makes its points in a clear and very literal way from title to content, but it’s none the worse for this, and perhaps it’s the literal lesson people need in order to see what the film is saying.

Dr Terra (Anna Popplewell) is a surgeon specialising in the removal of ‘foreign bodies’ (now there’s a phrase which can speak many volumes). She’s about to go on maternity leave, so her spirits are pretty high – but the end of her shift gets surprisingly, nightmarishly busy, with a sudden influx of people all needing her help to remove a variety of items. As her expertise is called on again and again, Plastic Surgery becomes something of a body horror, albeit one with an environmentalist flair: the foreign bodies in question are all disposable plastics. It’s unpleasant and it’s discomfiting, but it’s a great perspective on just how choked by plastics we really are.

Finally, there’s Skin: a young woman, Kanika (Shreya Navile) is on her way to her first skin bleaching session. We can see that she’s preoccupied with her skin tone, as we see her scrolling through her image gallery, tweaking the levels on her selfies until she appears as pale as possible. Her sister Ria (Sureni Weerasekera) is not interested; more than that, she’s horrified that her own flesh and blood would fall in with such a nonsense beauty norm. But Kanika is unswayed, and heads into the clinic.

Clinics in horrors, sci-fi and anything close are always oddly terrifying places and this one is no exception. Kanika’s treatment requires her to immerse herself in a milk-white liquid, which she does, but there’s something off about the whole set-up here. Outside, and in agreement with that sentiment, Ria makes the decision to intervene and when she gets inside, she sees far more evidence of the clinic’s strange practices. The thing is, they might want Ria to stay, too…

There are clear elements of The Substance (2024) in here, though shifted around to examine a skin tone perspective, rather than a more straightforward set of anxieties about ageing. Nonetheless, Skin is its own beast, doesn’t need to be super-subtle to make its point, and uses striking visuals to do it. It’s pretty certain that the beauty industry will continue to generate very specific horrors, and Skin a welcome entrant to that genre, especially considering its handling of a non-white perspective – relatively rare for now, but again, that will almost certainly change.

FrightFest 2025: Your Host

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

Feeling nostalgic for the torture horror wave of the Noughties yet? If you are, then Your Host (2025) has got you covered. The proviso which comes with this, however, is that if you didn’t particularly enjoy that style of filmmaking, then this isn’t the one to win you over. It’s a clear and affectionate homage to the kinds of more-or-less mindless cruelty of the first few Saw titles, and any number of the similar, low-budget titles which followed in their wake.

We even start with a man chained to a chair, just for the avoidance of doubt. The set-up here is that someone is filming his torment, torment which is taking place under the auspices of some kind of televised ‘game’. That it’s being filmed as a kind of gameshow schtick also owes some debt to the hyper-cynical 80s with its own ultraviolent TV show plotlines and subplots, but this isn’t The Running Man, and the links are mainly confined to the idea that people behave so much worse when they think they have an audience to please.

We start out with a few of the same issues which have dogged those low-budget ordeal flicks since their Noughties heyday. Perhaps that’s all part of the homage. Case in point: there’s a few moments early on in the main storyline of Your Host which leads you to wonder: are these people genuinely meant to be relatable, or are they simply being offered up as disposable, so that we don’t care what happens? This minor confusion is caused by the early characterisation of a cluster of (mostly) affluent twentysomethings whom we see rocking up at a fancy summerhouse for the weekend. The script is lavish with nonsense meant to show them as socially responsible, bright young things, but it just comes off as a checklist of ways these people are likely to annoy us. We then see them ‘partying’ like much younger kids, double-daring one another to kiss, vaping, squabbling – right before they hear a disturbance outside and one of their number heads outside to investigate. There, he finds a video camera on a tripod, which he brings inside, but strangely, after some initial comment this fact seems to go out-of-mind for a while, and the foursome continue carping at each other or flirting with each other. Me, I’d be more bothered. Before too long, however, the camera-owner comes to retrieve it…

Just prior to things suddenly becoming a lot nastier, rich boy James (Jamie Flatters) – whose family owns this place – yells out in exasperation at one of the girls, ‘I am sick of this jump scare bullshit!’ To be fair to Your Host, this could serve as a descriptor of the rest of the film, as it very much avoids any more of these, or indeed that kind of horror at all. The premise is this: a failed TV star and serial killer called Barry (!) (Jackie Earle Haley) has captured our houseguests and confined them in a modified building, where he will force them to take part in a warped gameshow format. As they take part in his games, they gradually get dispatched in a number of genuinely unpleasant and grisly ways.

The whole ‘torture porn’ arc was not to this reviewer’s especial tastes – with a handful of exceptions – so seeing it being both commemorated and resurrected here is a strange feeling, but to give it its dues: Your Host is definitely a grower. Sure, the people it introduces are thinly drawn, but under the specific kinds of pressure they’re then placed under, their characterisation improves; Jackie Earle Haley is an old hand at this kind of thing and, as the demented host, he does a decent turn; he’s always interesting when he’s on screen, and rather than playing it entirely po-faced, he’s able to add a surprising amount of energy and charm to his role. You could even call him affable; he gets to add a few jokes and they land, being so much more subtle than the initial writing would suggest is in store.

This film can also boast high production values too: it may be nasty, but it does not look cheap. Gore FX are obviously a huge part of this kind of cinema, and here the effects are – with no exaggeration – superb, with one sequence in particular prompting a ‘how did they do that?’. Any CGI is hard to detect; this is for the most part a hands-on practical affair, and gorehounds will find plenty to love. It also jogs along at a fair pace with its unflinching violence and its blaring soundtrack, and it’s at it its best when it does. Things lag briefly when there’s an oddball addition of a #MeToo moment meant as justification for the events unfolding, which the film categorically doesn’t need. Wherever it pauses to talk politics, it loses some of its charm and impetus.

However, it’s worth saying that horror fans get the warm fuzzies over the strangest of things, so there’s very likely a whole army of people out there who will get that feeling from Your Host. If you cut your teeth on Saws and Hostels, then there’s plenty of gore and grime here to entertain you. At the very least, and if you’re someone not averse to a jump scare or to other kinds of horror altogether, you can certainly still appreciate the set pieces and the commitment to the craft displayed here by director DW Medoff, the magicians at the Imaginari Factory in Rome and the rest of the team.

Your Host (2025) received its world premiere at FrightFest London on August 22nd 2025.

FrightFest 2025: Blood Shine

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

Blood Shine (2025) is an immediate barrage of contrasts – tonal and aesthetic – and it maintains its multi-layered approach throughout, using different styles of horror as it grows steadily more intense and provocative. If there are echoes of other films in here – and you may notice a few – there’s more than enough here which is original and compelling. It’s a hectic, heady piece of storytelling.

As the film begins, we see a woman dragging what appears to be a body, except upwards along the right-hand margin of the opening screen; it’s her horizon, but from our perspective, it immediately establishes that something strange and oblique is going to take place. Our first glimpse of this woman, and her strange salute to the sun as it appears behind her, segues into recorded footage of Heaven’s Gate-style footage of a cultish figure extolling the usual means of attaining ‘salvation’. These things are all important, both as clues and as part of the overarching narrative frame.

There’s another sharp contrast at this point, as we briefly meet a struggling ex-con by the name of Keith (Brendan Sexton III), scratching out a living as a dairy farmer, but by necessity about to seek employment elsewhere; he’s barely holding it together, and in pursuit of this new job he heads off down a lonely road, suffering an almost obligatory literal breakdown to match his incoming figurative one, before seeking help at a nearby house. He’s surprised to be greeted by a young woman who introduces herself as Clara (co-writer and co-director Emily Bennett). She’s understandably a little alarmed by the late night call, but agrees to help him. It takes Keith a surprisingly small amount of time to begin eyeing up his prim, porcelain host; Clara keeps up her kindly, philosophical approach for the time being, but it’s clear that this man’s main character behaviour may turn out to be ill-advised.

Here, things shift sharply; the film lurches forward in time in a brief, episodic way, showing us enough to show us that Clara is not what she at first seems to be – but then it whips us away elsewhere, where we meet someone new (though, noticeably, it’s another man with a certain sense of entitlement). Deftly, it seems for a moment as though the film’s opening titles (which finally appear) and the new character’s own film (which again blends into the main film here) are one and the same. Blood Shine has several of these moments, and keeps this firm kind of control over its narrative throughout. This new man, Brighton West (David Call) is working on a new project after enjoying some success as a horror filmmaker. Now, he’s under pressure to get working on his newest project, Craven IV, but the pressure is not bringing out the best in him, to say the least. He heads off into the sticks to try and write, but guess who he meets once he’s there?

This is not, as we know, the first time she has been involved in this kind of encounter with a recalcitrant man – but perhaps this new, complex, dysfunctional relationship could be different in key respects.

Blood Shine is, first and foremost, an aesthetic powerhouse, beautifully and diversely filmed, edited and soundtracked; it’s also self-referential in a few moments, without ever stepping away from its central premise and story or somehow making light (pun intended) of them. It offers a collision between very worldly considerations and something far more ethereal, mysterious and terrifying. In many respects it’s a grim series of moral lessons, albeit where morals are being quantified and organised on behalf of a shadowy organisation: we never get to know much about them, but we see the impact of their teachings upon Clara and, by extension, on Brighton. Whilst the film makes use of some recognisable Noughties new-extremity horror tropes as it goes, right down to the reasoning behind the torments being inflicted, it never feels derivative. It achieves much of what it does via its committed performances – particularly from the fantastic Emily Bennett – and its sharp, bitter, economical script.

This is also a film which manages its self-referential moments carefully, pausing to ground the characters in a world which the audience will recognise; it’s no accident that one of our central characters here is a horror director. By the by, when Brighton bewails the ‘inauthenticity’ of American folk horror as he tries and fails to draw inspiration from the woods where he’s ended up, it made me think of what I’d consider the origins of literary American folk horror – Charles Brockden Brown and Wieland, with its own brand of grisly, God-driven horrors. There feels like a progression here, accidental or otherwise, although the film flips several elements and offers up a wild, symbolism-rich crescendo, a kind of pre-Raphaelite Kill List and a film which more than rewards your attention. Look out for a couple of cameos by a few indie horror stalwarts along the way, too.

Blood Shine (2025) received its international premiere at London FrightFest on 23rd August 2025.

Weapons (2025)

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

Zach Cregger’s follow-up to Barbarian (2022) has been inspiring tentatively hopeful comment (and some controversy) ever since it was first announced; surely a director who essentially founded Airbnb horror – a genre for our times every bit as valid as social media horror – could do great things with what looked, from its initial premise, like a simple enough set-up. Here’s how it starts (and, by the way, if you haven’t yet seen the film, where your reading should end). The story opens at 2:17 in the morning, when an elementary class all rose from their beds – and ran out into the night. They haven’t been seen since, and only one child from the entire class remains.

There’s a sense fairly early on in Weapons (2025) that, just maybe, the police could have honed their detective skills a little more sharply and thought up some of the triangulation later performed by another, non-detective character, but hey – mistakes have been made and are being made, and in lieu of tracking down their children the small town has turned its hopeless anger on the class teacher, Justine (Julia Garner). It’s interesting that agency is granted to the teacher in amounts not handed down to the police themselves, although father Archer (Josh Brolin) keeps up both the enquiries at the local sheriff’s office and his desperate witch-hunt; arguably, Justine comes off worse, and starts to retreat into casual alcoholism – though she has made errors along the way, bringing down the weight of the local education authority upon herself for her past sins against safeguarding, then doing so again when her own desperation drives her to look into the disappearances too.

This is a film comprised of interlocking and overlapping narratives, with a range of characters each picking up their own trail, and as they do so, it’s clear to the audience that these are all flawed people. There are seemingly no clear-sighted adults in this film, whether the blame-hungry dad, the class teacher, the troubled cop or the local criminal (and we may notice that addiction issues loom over the film as a whole).

The film valiantly holds onto its secrets for a large swathe of its runtime without sacrificing the interest and engagement which we feel, and it’s only when we get into last classmate Alex’s story that the threads really begin to come together. Its use of supernatural and occult elements may feel overly familiar, given some of this year and last year’s biggest hitters in the horror genre, but for this reviewer it works incredibly well – using the occult as a ripe source not only of the horror itself, but as a source of misdirection. We all know the phrase ‘witch hunt’ and typically understand it to mean an unnecessary, cruel pursuit of the wrong person or persons in pursuit of some eroded sense of justice. Here it’s abundant and abundantly explored, because Weapons also understands that occult in its most literal sense, meaning ‘hidden’, is the key to why events can remain so mysterious for so long.

One character whose story we don’t get in the same way is Gladys (Amy Madigan), and Cregger’s artful use of narrative gaps and obfuscations suits her storyline perfectly, making us glean what we can from what we have.

Please be mindful of spoilers in the following sections...

Weapons makes extensive and creative use of the theme of witchcraft; it also blends the theme cleverly with a whole rack of Chekov’s guns, being as it is a film full of discourse around consumption, around parasitism, and around an exploration of different types of power in society. In Weapons, we see how an aged woman without means develops new means, magically sustaining herself by using the bodies and minds of others as sources of literal and metaphorical strength. It’s entirely possible to read this development as further evidence of women’s comparative powerlessness in society, and to think of all the women – themselves of limited means – who fell victim to other, harsher historical witch hunts in their tens of thousands. That we’re still demonising older women only points back to itself, showing our own prejudices are intact; nothing has changed.

However, and to return to the theme of power, it’s equally possible to see the fear engendered by Gladys as a kind of power – not just over her victims, but over us as the audience. Gladys is fearsome, and fearful only in rare, valedictory, shocking moments of comeuppance. Even so, it’s not possible to say her threat is ever assuaged, because normality never fully resumes here. Even literally consumed in one of the film’s clear nods to fairy tales like Hansel and Gretel, Gladys holds some kind of sway over the home and the town which took her in. It’s a fantasy about a fantasy, sure, but grant this ailing old lady her dues: she’s terrifying, and resourceful.

Hers is a particularly brutal and compelling version of old folkloric beliefs about witches, too; the locks of hair, the wands, even what look like scrying baths have been rendered down and repurposed into means to commit extreme acts, either instantaneous control, or longer-term, draining the life out of anyone coming into contact whether with Gladys herself or with the unwitting magician’s apprentice Alex, who probably suffers the longest and endures the greatest psychological harm. Whilst this isn’t a detailed character study of a film – nor does it need to be – there’s more than enough here to show real, grounded repercussions for its people.

Nonetheless, it’s one of horror cinema’s real mean-spirited joys to be able to show us what a malign witch can do, and Weapons certainly doesn’t disappoint in this respect – particularly when it performs that necessary, but no less enjoyable about-face, granting audiences a particularly hard-hitting, exhilarating final sequence. There are worthy payoffs for the film’s puzzles, offering a crowd-pleasing balance of suspense and high action. Above all else, this film is a lot of fun.

Weapons (2025) is on general cinematic release now.

Win The Conjuring on 4K UHD!

Posted on by Keri O'Shea

Hello! Warped Perspective has had a short summer vacation, as I’ve been lucky enough to spend some time travelling in Norway, but we’re now back with some great upcoming titles (both short films and features) and – another great competition courtesy of the good folks at Fetch.

We have one copy of the upcoming 4K release of The Conjuring, a big hit at the time of its release and a title which has since bedded in as one of the best supernatural horrors of the past couple of decades. Personally, I think it’s the Ed and Lorraine Warren connection: whether you’re a sceptic or a believer, there’s just something about their casebook and the films which have derived from it which weaves a fantastically unnerving kind of horror.

The 4K UHD contains the following special features:

Scariest of Them All (NEW)​
The cast and creators of The Conjuring take a look back at some of the greatest scares of the series, uncovering what made these films so iconic.​

Reflections on The Conjuring (NEW)​
More than a decade after the release of the original film, the cast and crew of The Conjuring reflect on their experiences creating one of the most legendary horror series in history.​

The Conjuring: Face-to-Face with Terror​
Relive the real-life horror as the Perron family comes together to reflect back on the farmhouse they shared with diabolical spirits for nearly a decade.

A Life in Demonology​
The real demonologist and paranormal experts from The Conjuring take you inside their life’s work and into their personal occult cellar, where they keep haunted and unholy relics from their many cases.

Scaring the “@$★%” Out of You​
Director James Wan (Saw, Insidious) welcomes you into his world and gives an inside look at the at the scenes that scare the “@$★%” out of moviegoers time and time again.​

This is up for grabs from August 25th for our UK-based readers and as usual, all you need to do is to email in with The Conjuring as your email title. Please enclose your name and address (the site is GDPR compliant; everything gets safely deleted after the competitions close).

To give just a little more time for prospective entrants, the competition will close at 12pm (GMT) on Wednesday 27th August – just because the turnaround is a little tight otherwise.

Good luck!