DVD Review: Clown (2014)

By Keri O’Shea

Hating clowns is pretty much a religious observance in Western culture. No one really needs to explain, ‘I hate clowns’, and no one ever seems to be indifferent to them, let alone like the things, save for women of a certain age who are into naff figurines; it’s weird, though, that so many people have an opinion on something they haven’t ever seen first-hand in their original environment. I don’t know many people who’ve even been to the circus or ever had clowns turn up to entertain them at parties, or if they have, it’s certainly not frequent and/or traumatic enough to create a genuine aversion to them. In fact, most folk seem to encounter clowns primarily through the medium of horror movies, in which case, it’s like saying you have a phobia of masked killers. Of course you fucking do.

Regardless, ‘coulrophobia’ is an accepted Thing, everyone seems to have it, and it forms the basis of a lot of films like Clown (2014), which itself is based on a mock trailer. The original filmmakers, Jon Watts and Christopher D. Ford, mocked up this trailer and added that it was ‘from master of horror Eli Roth’; it wasn’t, at the time, but Roth saw it and liked the idea, getting on board as a producer to make the film into a real feature, directed by Watts. The end result is what we have here.

Following in the footsteps of the faux trailer, things begin to happen when someone double-books a clown meant to entertain at young Jack’s birthday party. Mom telephones dad, Kent, and asks him to step in. Kent works in real estate and, as cinematic luck would have it, he finds a clown outfit in a mysterious and dusty old chest in the basement of a house newly on his books. Isn’t it always the way? He puts it on, heads home and does rather a good job of entertaining the nippers. Thing is, when he tries, he can’t take the suit back off. And suddenly that’s not a wig anymore – that’s his own, curly, rainbow-coloured hair! The clown seems to be taking him over somehow, and he needs to find out as much as he can about this mysterious outfit before it’s too late and bad things happen…

The back story of this film is quite interesting, however – altogether – the back story turns out to be more engaging than the feature itself. As noble as the sentiment behind all of this is, Clown is simply better as a fake trailer. It was conceived as a trailer, and trailer it should have remained; there simply isn’t enough plot here to go round. Even a short film would have been the better option. Sure, the fake ‘clown origins’ yarn is pretty funny, and some of the visual gags work (though where they do, like the rainbow-coloured blood spray, they’re repeated over and over) but all in all this film is agonisingly slow. Not having written enough story, Watts seems to have deliberately directed this film in slow-mo; for example, one sequence with a child crawling through a tunnel seemed to go on forever, and the upshot of it all plain doesn’t reward the patience it requires of the audience.

It’s all a bit awry in terms of what it wants to do, too, as well as taking aeons to get there. Does it want to play for laughs? Well, sort of, in places, but then it’s padded out with reams of wan, po-faced seriousness, all muted colours and gloom, which rests uncomfortably with the central premise of the film – i.e. a demonic clown running amok. Upping the ante and playing it for obscene laughs would seem to have been the best way to handle this material, even if it meant going in a slightly different direction to the original trailer (though even that has a lot more colour and camp to it than the end feature). Things aren’t helped by the writing for mom Meg (Laura Allen) who commands most of the camera time, more than our clown does for sure, but she genuinely seems confused by what’s going on and has one facial expression to communicate this. Laura Allen has a solid pedigree as an actress, though not so much as a horror actress, and perhaps she wasn’t quite at her best here, though I’ll admit my eyes begin to roll as soon as we’re faced with Obligatory Pregnant Woman in Peril in a film.

Ultimately, if you’re a card-carrying clown phobic then you’ll probably find sufficient material here to pretend to cower from, even though there’s a surprising lack of gore – some weak CGI moments notwithstanding – considering the Roth involvement (though rest easy – a chair with manacles does feature.) It’s not a terrible idea, this, but if your film is called Clown then you expect more of the clown and less of the dull human drama. Neither frightening nor funny, here’s another lesson to prove that fake trailers are often fine just as they are.

Clown is out on limited cinema release now and comes to Blu-ray and DVD on March 2nd 2015.

DVD Review: Hardware (1990)

vlcsnap-2015-02-20-12h09m26s219

By Keri O’Shea

Post-apocalyptic or dystopian movies always seem to be balanced on a knife-edge, both telling audiences about certain anxieties that existed for the future, whilst also being very much of the time when they were made; they act as both time-capsule and time machine. In the case of Hardware, re-released here on its twenty-fifth anniversary, many of its elements are quite familiar to similar dystopian films that had preceded it: people routinely thought that, should humanity’s number be up in the foreseeable future, then it would be via global-scale warfare, technology gone rogue and/or the feckless, profit-driven corporations which were behind it all (and quelle change). Elements of these ideas are brought into play in Hardware, but they are not hugely developed; being based on a 2000 AD comic strip, its substance is more about aesthetics than content. More than that, Hardware is interesting in that it looks like a very subculture-specific take on the end of the world as we know it. It’s part movie, part Psychic TV broadcast, an atmosphere-driven film which is choc-ful of nods to the underground scene of the day, though perhaps stretched somewhat by the feature-length format.

We start at some unspecified (in the film) point in the near future: America seems to have been decimated by what could be nuclear war, as there is frequent mention made of spiralling radiation, and the drifter we first encounter wandering the arid wastes (hot, permanently-dusty musician Carl McCoy, playing Carl McCoy – whom I’m not even sure knows he was in a film) seems to make his living collecting scrap metal from the sand dunes, even though this is on the outskirts of NYC. He discovers parts of a robot, buried: the head in particular looks intact and probably worth something, so he takes it straight to a dealer named Alvy (Mark Northover) but ends up selling it to a soldier, Mo (Dyman McDermott) who happens to be passing through with a friend of his.

Mo decides to take the head to his girlfriend’s place as a Christmas gift. Jill (Stacey Travis) doesn’t seem too keen on going far from her apartment, and spends her time working on junk art – you know the stuff, melding burned baby dolls to bits of metal and such. She is happy with her gift and soon sets to work on it; too late does Alvy manage to get the message to Mo that the robot – which turns out to be an experimental MARK-13 – might not be fully deactivated after all. Soon, Jill is at grave risk from what’s inside her own apartment.

hardwareThat is the plot of the film in a nutshell, for as stated above, vast storylines and developments are not the chief concerns for Hardware. The film spends as much time watching Jill spray-painting the skull (so it resembles the stars and stripes, naturally) as it really does looking into the existence or purpose of the robot itself, and although the film is doubtlessly evocative in its way, its plot-lite style felt a little wearing to this reviewer, at least when diluted across ninety minutes. However, it does have some effectively creepy scenes; the robot’s self-reassembly routine looked like Uncle Frank bursting out from beneath the attic floorboards, only comprising nuts, bolts and wires rather than flesh, blood and veins. It’s a remarkably effective piece of SFX, and the film’s moments of gore have aged rather well too, even if you have to wait for them. The biggest development here of all is really in the character of Jill, who moves from (stoned) damsel in distress, with primal scream to match, to a figure of vengeance when the robot harms or threatens to harm the few people she has in her life, and this gives the film some deserved impetus – I’m not sure I could have coped with the same game of cat and mouse all the way through.

Ultimately though, Hardware is all about the brutal aesthetics, 2000 AD through-and-through, right down to one of the extras – though we don’t see many extras – wearing a biker jacket with the Tank Girl logo painted on it. Via its soundtrack and its add-ons – flashes of Jill’s TV set always seem to be showing the type of thing you’d get appearing on the screen in a Ministry video (and oh hey – there is a Ministry video here too!) – this film is surely meant to display the rock fan’s post-apocalyptic landscape of choice. Did I also mention Lemmy pops up here briefly, as a taxi driver? And Iggy Pop has a voice cameo as radio DJ ‘Crazy Bob’? Incidentally, Bethesda Games – we definitely know where you got the idea for your radio DJ in Fallout 3, but I digress…if you have a place in your heart for the late 80s rock/industrial vibe then there’s plenty to gawp at here, and the cinematography is, in its own way, gorgeous. Ruination here looks incredibly picturesque, and the meticulously put together set pieces, with careful attention paid to how they’re lit, adds tenfold to the overall effect, as does the harsh musical score.

Yes, aside from some gripes about the flatness of plot which can feel frustrating, the film looks onerously like Terminator in places, only it all takes place more in the domestic sphere, and the religious symbolism is at times added with a trowel – though to be fair, that’s religious symbolism generally. Hardware has its issues, sure, but it’s interesting enough as an entry into the post-apocalyptic genre to merit a watch. The real shame here is that this ’25th Anniversary Edition’ is incredibly bare bones with no extra features whatsoever; it’s not even chaptered. Perhaps my review copy lacks other features which will be included on the main release, and the DVD box does promise a typotastic ‘To [sic] limited edition illustrations from World [sic] renowned comic artist Clint Langley’, though there weren’t any in mine. Hey ho.

Hardware – 25th Anniversary Edition will be released on DVD and Blu-ray on 23rd February 2015.

Horror in Short: The Outer Darkness (2014)

outderdarkness3

By Keri O’Shea

In former times, people thought of diseases and afflictions as evidence of God’s wrath, or even evidence of the intervention of malign forces – namely demons, entities which could infiltrate and possess the human body, given the opportunity. In modern times, we have (mostly) disposed of these ideas, and now view afflictions such as addiction as having a medical cause. However, if we now consider addiction an illness, then maybe there is room to re-interpret it according to older ideas; perhaps addiction, as suggested by our (highly believable) first speaker in The Outer Darkness, could really mean that addicts are under the sway of …something, some malign outsider influence.

Straight away, then, Father Crowe’s recovery group is revealed to be no ordinary one. Everyone’s story and everyone’s reason for being there is accepted, however outlandish it may all seem. This impression only strengthens when a new member of the group, Jen (Isla Carter) describes the events which have brought her there. She relates the story of a personal tragedy, then what she did to try to rectify it: the surreal situation she found herself in, a game, a wager and a crushing aftermath.

Slightly longer than our usual Horror in Short films, you can now watch the first part of The Outer Darkness, which is intended to be a webseries, here…

I hope I’m doing no disservice to directors Ben Franklin and Anthony Melton when I say that the influence of classic British horror Hellraiser is recognisable here. The cold, shadowy colour palette is one thing; the grotesque, deformed or mutilated master of the roulette wheel who seems to be giving a nod to the Cenobites is another, albeit he is rather more debonair than Pinhead in his sharp suit, and there is something very unsettling about the sprightly movements and gestures he makes – making him feel very much like an old hand at this game. However, even within the twenty-five minutes used for this first-parter, Franklin & Melton show that they have ambitions way beyond any sort of an homage, even though the idea of playing for one’s life/soul via a puzzle or a game – where the games master knows all the rules and can use a certain sleight of hand to win – is itself a classic horror staple. The Outer Darkness hints at a far more tangled web to come, with its own distinctive entities and story development, as enough is shown here to demonstrate ambition. The religious aspect only really comes to the fore at the close of the film, too, and I’d anticipate further development of these themes. A good short film makes for a good calling card; as such, via some economical reveals as the film draws to a close, The Outer Darkness shows it has more yet to say.

Developing a solid level of interest in its story through its naturalistic actors, competent script and effective aesthetics, The Outer Darkness has more clout and a higher veneer of cinematic quality than many other webseries out there, which seem to assume they have ample opportunity to improve as they go along. Rather, you need to establish interest from the get-go, and this film is an engaging taster which promises far more to follow.

DVD Review: The Babadook (2013)

babadook

By Keri O’Shea

Amelia (Essie Davis) is a woman for whom the cliche ‘on the edge’ barely even covers it. A single mother whose partner died taking her to the hospital to give birth to their son, Samuel (Noah Wiseman), she has in the nearly-seven years since then barely really existed; she holds down a job, but just, and maintains a relationship with her sister, but again – only just. The reason for this seems to be that her little boy has more or less driven away every sane adult in her life, and of the ones that are left, most of them are getting towards the point of open revolt. See, there’s a lot of terminology to explain Samuel’s type of behaviour, all of which still make me want to gently remove my uterus and bury it somewhere – as whatever you want to call it, it manifests as constant back-chat, aggressive conduct with other kids, and most wearyingly for mum, an obsession with ‘monsters’ which drives him to make his own weapons, like some sort of Satanic spin on Home Alone, leading him to getting into constant trouble at school whilst jeopardising Amelia’s (probably poorly-paid) job, as she has to go and collect him and/or smooth several situations over on a regular basis. She’s not sleeping, barely eating, and his upcoming birthday only serves as a mean-spirited reminder of what she lost when he came into the world. Parent or no parent, it’s hard not to sympathise with this exhausted lady whose son rides rough-shod over her as a human being, harping on the same idea over and over again and insisting she reads him more stories which fuel his imagination even more and worsens the situation at home.

The first element of horror in The Babadook is, then, utterly mundane, relating to social isolation and the bleak downside of raising a child, but believe me, it’s no less effective for that. A turning-point occurs fairly early in, however – when Samuel requests (and is of course granted) a story, and as usual, Amelia selects a book from their shelf. Its title is The Babadook: funnily enough, Amelia doesn’t recognise the book, and as the story progresses, she finds herself growing more and more uneasy at its escalatingly violent content. She refuses to read on – but Samuel is already obsessed with the Babadook creature as described, and oddly, something about the character makes a bleary-eyed Amelia fixate on it, too. Is she just losing her mind? Because strange things start to happen, both at home and outside, and it seems that the story’s promise that ‘if it’s in a word, or in a look, you can’t get rid of the Babadook’ may ring true after all…

babadook coverAn effective set-up and the slow drip-drip-drip of odd phenomena (director and writer Jennifer Kent certainly understands that less is more) means that, for the first half of the film, this figured as one of the most effective and yes, scary features I’d seen in a long while. The Babadook mostly avoids the tired old routine so beloved of modern multiplex horrors, i.e. to make you jump out of your seat at least once every five minutes or else ostensibly fail as a frightening story; this has little to do with genuine scares and more to do with tinkering with your reflexes, and I can quite happily do without it. That isn’t an issue here, and things are far more unsettling when you, like Amelia, might or might not have glimpsed something there…and the Babadook itself is barely-seen, unless in partial darkness, which allows the imagination to kick in. More like this, please. Fear of the dark is alive and well in this film. Furthermore, the net effect of these incidents on Amelia is very interesting; during the course of the movie, she and Samuel effectively change roles, so that he’s the rational and forward-thinking member of the household, whilst mum descends into fright, then petulance – and worse. After wanting to throttle the little sod when I first encountered him here, after a while you start to see Sam’s perspective – of adults as scary – at least as scary, statuesque and malignant as anything from his picture books. It’s a clever about-face and the performance of the two lead actors has to be as strong as it is to achieve it.

However, this phenomenally powerful build-up does begin to falter somewhat as the film moves closer to its resolution. One of the reasons for that, I believe, is that the set-up gets through a lot of its more ambiguous moments early on, and in order to move forward to some sort of closure to the story then it needs must change tack, with more of overt, high action taking place on-screen and less left to the imagination. It’s hard to imagine a way out of this which would have rounded out the tale in an engaging way, in fairness, though I’m sure it could have been done. The second reason, though, relates to the nature of the exposition itself, and I’m reluctant to discuss it here, as to do so would almost certainly spoiler the film – but basically, the film reveals a metaphorical element to the goings-on, and this is hammered home pretty hard. The Babadook remains engaging throughout, fair enough, but in the last thirty minutes or so, I did feel like some of the spelling-out could have been omitted and the audience could have been trusted to decipher the plot a little more independently. But then, that’s the potential risk of starting so strong…

The Babadook made a lot of people’s top films lists at the end of 2014, and despite some issues, it is deservedly so. It’s a film which meshes the real and the unreal in a very scary way, and as it makes Amelia act like a kid again, so it does the audience – jumping at shadows, doubting their own eyes and cowering from the superhuman baddie on the screen. Playing hell with the seemingly magic power of stories is something this film shows it can do over and over, whilst never neglecting the fact that adult life, with all its vulnerabilities and concerns, can be a pretty scary place too.

The Babadook is available on DVD and Blu-ray from today (16th February 2015), from Icon.

“Midian is Where the Monsters Live”: Nightbreed at 25

midian

By Keri O’Shea

We humans seem oddly hardwired to believe in the presence of worlds separate to, but overlapping with, our own: this notion forms the bedrock of a whole wealth of folklore and ritual practice throughout history, and it has persisted, although the places and the means of admission have shifted over the centuries. The Celts thought that the Otherworld was accessible via water, with pools, bog and lakes proving fertile space for sacrificial offerings to be made; when the Abrahamic religions bumped the old gods to the back of the queue, a dizzying array of other worlds appeared, particularly in Catholicism, and although these were ostensibly ‘from whose bourn no traveller returns’, Heaven, Hell, Purgatory and Limbo still seemed oddly present. Not only that, but each could be reached from Earth, with those in Heaven aware of life on Earth and the living able to pray to influence the lot of the dead, to give just a couple of examples. The world as we know it swarmed with other worlds, with beings like us yet not us, or even beings that were us, once – worlds we could feasibly influence or even end up inhabiting. Little wonder that popular literature embraced this notion; kids’ books have long cherished their Narnias and their Lands of Do As You Please, and fantasy stories aimed at older readers have exploited the idea for darker, more disturbing fare…because, if hidden worlds can exist, then might not monsters also exist therein?

nightbreed ritual

Clive Barker’s novella, Cabal, formed the basis for Nightbreed (1990) – and developed the idea that, on Earth, there could exist a place sacrosanct for monsters, a city hidden apart and safe from from humanity. This place he called Midian, a home and sanctuary for bizarre beings (the Night Breed alluded to in the title) who have been routinely and aggressively drummed onto the fringes of human society by human cruelty, resentment and fear. It is here that a young man called Aaron Boone finds himself, having long been haunted by dreams of the place and its inmates; Boone is a troubled young man, prone to nightmares, and seeking psychiatric help from possibly the one person least likely to help him: Dr. Decker is a fraud, a man literally and figuratively hiding behind a mask whilst he frames Boone for a spate of murders which he himself has committed. Boone, reduced to a renegade, eventually manages to find his way to the city of Midian. His welcome there is …minimal, at first, and it is only via his death that he can first gain admittance – however his presence in Midian, his relationship with his girlfriend Lori, and the rising power of the daemonic Decker, forces a series of events which lead to a last stand – a war between human and monster.

It’s a powerful and equally, quite a simple story in its barest form, one which Barker was keen to direct himself on the big screen (and it’s a sad thing that Barker has directed so little in latter years): however, the film which we long considered the finished article fell far short of the mark for Barker himself, and has perhaps understandably impacted on his desire to direct. It’s an age-old story of fundamental misunderstandings between director and studio, one which could form the basis of a book all its own, but perhaps (and I freely admit my bias here) it’s particularly galling when Barker’s vision gets so deeply compromised, as was the case – sadly – with Nightbreed. Barker’s imagination is one of a kind; its energy and complexity deserve careful handling, lest the spell, if you like, be broken. With Nightbreed, the studio seems to have decided they wanted a conventional horror yarn and insisted upon the film being shorn by around an hour in length; miserable with the results, the planned trilogy never occurred and the film remained in its clipped condition until 2009, when it began to get pieced together again with the replacement of the removed footage, long presumed lost. The director’s cut is now intact and available – which is a great credit to the work of all concerned, and something of a miracle, all considered.

However, in 1990 I didn’t know any of that. I was ten, perhaps obviously I hadn’t read the novella, and I had no concept of what the film should have been, or shouldn’t have been. All I knew – in common with my earlier and equally influential awareness of a certain film called Hellraiser – was what the video shop posters and covers later told me, aided and abetted by seeing the trailer on something else I probably shouldn’t have been watching. Did I even realise that the director was the same guy? That’s something I can’t say for sure now, but in terms of the style and subject matter, I was equally intrigued. I didn’t know how it had done at the Box Office; I’d been to the cinema maybe twice up until that age, as we didn’t have one in my town and my family didn’t own a car. I was a reasonably switched-on kid, but I’m not confident I even knew what a box office was. But monsters; secret worlds; that was what interested me, with that child’s level of focus and imagination – the loss of which I mourn as an adult and always want to rekindle. I wanted to see Nightbreed. I wanted to know more about Midian. I used to have a recurring dream, as an unhappy kid, that I took a shovel to some waste earth to try and dig for treasure. When I dug down low enough, I didn’t find any gold, but I struck a hole through the ceiling of a hidden community of people – strange people, dressed in ways I’d never seen, playing musical instruments I didn’t recognise – and they welcomed me, helping me climb down to them. Midian was like that dream only more complex, more formidable; it’s not hard to see why the idea appealed to a nascent horror fan with a certain fascination for these ideas. In Nightbreed, it’s okay to empathise with what in many other stories would be the villains – you can’t help but do otherwise, in fact. It’s a war-cry against human cruelty, and kids know cruelty as much as they’re also drawn to fantasy, to horror, to ways of playing that out.

nightbreed porcupine

The film itself, although the studio cramped its style somewhat and the challenges of bringing to the screen that which is quite abstract on the novella’s page proved difficult, is a nonetheless striking piece of work. On re-watching Nightbreed, I was struck by just how differently it looks compared to Hellraiser – only three years apart, and with the same writer, director and some of the cast, yet Nightbreed is warm and colourful in many places, almost like a picture book. Midian is located in a dilapidated cemetery reminiscent of old-school Gothic paintings, but its inmates are gloriously lurid and its spaces are well-lit as often as they are dank and fearsome – this is a horror film unafraid to play with its aesthetics, and it has other revolutionary aspects too. Getting into Midian may be a gruesome process (say ‘I have to show you my true face’ to any Nightbreed fan and they’ll immediately think of a key scene which does this very, very literally) but it’s not just some far-flung cesspit; it’s a functional community which operates by rules and traditions. Whilst the film looks very different to Hellraiser, they have in common the fact that it is human interference with the monsters’ rules which causes unrest, whether it’s preordained (as in this case) or otherwise. Here, it’s Lori’s – and Decker’s – attempts to infiltrate Midian which initiate a series of events threatening to its very survival. Decker is of course utterly emblematic of human callousness and cruelty: played with softly-spoken menace by none other than David Cronenberg, he’s a man who abuses his trusted – even venerated – position in society in order to murder without purpose, and his methodically cruel treatment of Boone surely resembles the doctor/patient relationship between Hannibal Lecter and Will Graham in the series Hannibal; as the later doctor explains, he ‘just wanted to see what would happen’. There’s some parity there with Decker, and again we’re made to reconsider exactly what it means to be monstrous.

decker

Humans are dangerous; humans are flawed and thrall to their own petty ambitions; humans are also finite, and another idea which provides Nightbreed with much of its power is in its exploration of mortality. To again return to the often childlike conception of hidden places and secret worlds, for many children – and a fair few adults – the concept of death is best explained as being a distant place, a destination, just somewhere …different, rather than a lack of being altogether. Children talk about ‘heaven’ and they often think of a geographical location – you have to ‘die’ to get there, but to get there, you take a trip. Midian plays with this idea and takes it to a more grisly conclusion, where you get your passport via the morgue – and then you live on forever, agelessly. Aaron Boone has joined the ranks of the Night Breed but he had to die, and violently, to take his particular trip. Lori and Decker’s quest to find out what happened to Boone is tinged with incredulity but also, they seem to crave what he has. Boone is now forever. Covetousness and intrigue pursue him, however, until even the creatures of Midian are not safe. Monsters may not exist under our rules, but human intervention can exorcise them anyway.

Or can it? Ultimately, Nightbreed is a film in which our heroes and our villains are inverted, giving us a film which is compelling and horrific. In true Barker style, we are shown human cruelty refracted through a grotesque, fantastical and lurid mirror; a persecution epic, a crime thriller, a fairy story, Nightbreed touches upon all of these distinct elements, but bundles them up in a new set of ways, making them recognisable and original all at once. Whilst it wouldn’t be the first or the last time audiences would be invited to sympathise with monsters, it had certainly never been done like this before, and Nightbreed remains a deeply influential piece of film – for all of its flaws or issues upon its initial release. Midian has exercised a hold on Nightbreed audiences ever since, a hidden other world to rival all others, and more evocative in its way than anything which has followed.

Film Review: Avenged (2013)

avenged2

By Keri O’Shea

The rape/revenge motif has been a staple in exploitation cinema for decades, and judging by the indie output of the last ten years or so, it’s not going anywhere anytime soon, either. I Spit On Your Grave has been blue-filtered and re-calibrated – more than once – for a younger generation, the presence of the woman-tied-to-chair is as recognisable a trope as any these days and a few years back, the UK’s biggest-budget horror movie festival was even being dubbed ‘RapeFest’ on social media by audiences nonplussed with the sheer number of films containing that plot line. I’m not here to wonder aloud why this is still such a storyline of choice – though the fact that the whole boys-maim-girl motif is so ubiquitous as to have become predictable does raise an eyebrow, and as there seems to be little danger of a let-up, it equally seems that the films themselves now have to raise the bar to get their own boys maiming girls noticed. Either the films get nastier and nastier, then, or – as with Avenged, which was formerly released under the title Savaged – the films must add something altogether different into the mix. Accordingly, Avenged has made the interesting, if oddball decision to mix a few genres together, namely by merging rape/revenge with a supernatural storyline. The ambitiousness of this deserves merit, although the film itself is not without several issues as a result.

Zoe (Amanda Adrienne, who here has more than a passing resemblance to a young Marilyn Burns) has recently lost her dad and decided to take her inheritance – his ‘pride and joy’ car – on a road trip to New Mexico, having failed to heed a warning that there are lots of nutters on the open road. (Zoe is also Deaf, though this makes little difference to anything that happens, save in one later scene.) After stopping to send a few selfies to her boyfriend Dane (Marc Anthony Samuel) she quickly learns the perils of texting whilst at the wheel, when she narrowly avoids hitting a man stood in the road and witnesses a gang of cookie-cutter rednecks mowing another man down. (And here’s the first reference to a race element in the plot: the rednecks are ‘hunting savages’, or native Americans as I gather they generally prefer.) Zoe tries to help the survivor, which is her second big mistake after the constant text-messaging; for her troubles, she’s abducted, tied to a bed, and then just what you’d expect to happen happens. So far, so harrowing.

avengedposterShe’s soon taken out and left for dead, but here’s where the film changes tack and doesn’t opt for the more usual angle of a young woman overcoming all odds by herself; rather than sticking with the realistic style which nonetheless usually means the lead female somehow survives everything as if by magic, Avenged invokes supernaturalism, but keeps it – by and large – looking gritty and realistic. Zoe is found by one of the locals, an Apache man who tries to revive her with his traditional medicine. It works, but at a price; she’s brought back but alongside the spirit of a vengeful Apache chieftain, who was killed by the ancestor of the same rednecks who tried to dispatch Zoe. This means she’s on borrowed time, but now comes imbued with his abilities…which, however you feel about this about-face, you have to admit is a different way of moving the plot forward. This will also be why I’ve seen the film compared to The Crow, but really speaking, it’s a poor comparison which doesn’t say much about Avenged except to allude to a supernatural/vengeance idea which couldn’t be handled more differently or less bloodily in the better-known title. What we have in Avenged is a badly-wounded (read: dead) rape victim who is resurrected as an undead agent of revenge, both hers and someone else’s: she has to work against time not because she only has a night, but because she’s literally falling apart. Hardly a gothic romance tale, there.

Before I come to my criticisms of this film and the way it unfolds, let me say that there is much to congratulate director Michael Ojeda for here. Firstly, although the film looks as though it was made for the Instagram generation (selfies and mobile phone pictures figure in the plot early on; coloured filters are abundant) it still looks very good actually, with crisp, bright colours, a sense of direction and scale to match the claustrophobia of later shots and throughout, a really good eye with nicely-composed shots. Additionally the soundtrack used, both the incidental music and the songs, are well-balanced and suitable, fitting very well, and the special effects – accomplished with good ol’ fashioned prosthetics and sparing CGI – are excellent. As for the performances, the actors involved do very well with their roles as well as in the case of Amanda Adrienne, getting really put through the wringer, and although one of my main issues with the film is with the yeehaw gang (see below) they, too, do their best with what they’re given. As a first horror feature from a guy who has so far built his career on sensationalist TV movies and the ‘Deadliest Warrior’ series, it’s an impressive gear shift we’re seeing. The first thing which really hobbles the film, though, is the redneck family I mentioned earlier. They really are repellent – and not in and of themselves, as their behaviour is clearly only intended to be read one way, but they’re just not well-written. Every redneck stereotype is blown up to grotesque proportions, but still held at enough of a distance to make the brothers feel cartoonish. In them, the expected racist, sexist, ill-educated dialogue just falls short; it’s not their acting, it’s the script, and I’d rather have had to dig a little deeper to see them as repulsive than by having them yelling about ‘nigger lovers’ or loudly taking pride in a family history of hunting Native Americans. I’m not saying people (broadly) like this don’t exist. I am saying that a massive over-reliance on this type of villain in horror can be very, very detrimental.

As for the genre-splicing, well, as I suggested, it does at least show that the filmmakers are daring to do something different. I had no idea how, if at all the ‘Crow’ elements I’d heard were going to happen, and so it had the benefit of catching me by surprise, upping the gore and changing the pace of the film from the more usual torture/vengeance yarn. The thing is, having sat through a fairly gruelling, bloody and violent abduction and sexual assault scene (although this isn’t given lots of screen time, it’s still as unpleasant as you’d think), the sudden introduction of elements which saw the film turning into something like an action flick/revenge porn/supernatural horror didn’t rest all that comfortably with me. Tonally, I felt confused. Add to that the fact that we are first asked to stomach a Native American plot line about murder and spectral revenge and then the film segues into camp lines like ‘My baby’s got an axe to grind!” and random footage of injuns appearing on a TV screen, and I couldn’t help but feel that the first half of the film was being sent up by the second – but why? Avenged starts out incredibly heavy, then changes around so much that it’s hard to take. Ambition is one thing, but a lot of its commendable ideas are flawed in execution. (I can see, by the by, why they’d drop the previous title ‘Savaged’, considering the way the film bandies around the term ‘savage’ as an insult to the Apaches. Maybe this was just one pun too far.)

To sum up, there are lots of good things going on here and in many respects, I was pleasantly surprised with Avenged. It’s also a hard film to call, because of the way it tries to transform itself and because of its surprises. Throughout, it has to choose between sensitivity to its subject matter and the sort of shocking creativity that will set it apart from the rest. In the end, it tends to ditch the sensitivity: maybe picking up the idea of the betrayal of the Native Americans to add onto a rape-revenge film is just one innovation too many, in the end, because a rape-revenge film is ultimately what Avenged remains.

Avenged will be available to view from March 2015.

Blu-ray Review: The Comedy of Terrors (1963)

comedyofterrrorsvp

By Keri O’Shea

The marriage of horror and comedy is not only nothing new, but it seems to have been a decidedly less tricky pairing, back when the gore was less protracted and graphic and the laughs depended less on shocks to make viewers laugh-out-loud. The distance between the two was shorter, see, but not only that: many of the actors who cut their teeth on lugubrious subject matter, or even made their names by it, were all too happy to send themselves up given the chance. Cue AIP, fresh from making their Tales of Terror the year previously, who launched into The Comedy of Terrors with many of the same cast members and a readiness to play for laughs as they did in The Raven. When you looks closer at the crew behind The Comedy of Terrors, though, it looks like a far more …unusual project. Written by Richard ‘I Am Legend’ Matheson and directed by Jacques Tourneur? What stripe of horror-comedy was this? the answer is, actually, rather a gentle one – whatever the oddball pedigree behind the title might promise.

comedyofterrorsWe start our tale in New England, at some point in the late 19th Century: Messrs. Trumbull (Vincent Price) and his assistant Gillie (Peter Lorre) are the hapless entrepreneurs behind an ailing undertakers’ business, which Price inherited via marriage from his wife’s husband, Mr. Hinchley (Boris Karloff). Not that Trumbull has any gratitude for this, mind, or any inclination to build the business up legitimately with hard graft; he’s an old sot, whose limited wit may raise a smirk of his own, but in time-honoured tradition can’t please his much-younger wife Amaryllis (who in similar time-honoured tradition coulda been someone) nor pay his towering bills. So much for that. But what to do when it looks as though the Trumbulls will be evicted? Why, housebreaking – and murdering the people they find inside, so it’s lucky that Trumbull & Gillie are first on the scene in the morning, ready to offer their services for the funeral. It’s a set-up which allows for plenty of haranguing, misunderstandings, pratfalls and failures to ‘shhhhhh!’ whatsoever – but it’s bound to go even more wrong…

The comedy of this film may be based around murder and fraud, but it all feels rather comforting, in its way. The first reason for this is that an absolutely superb cast all look wonderfully at ease with one another, an indication no doubt of their friendships off-screen and their shared relish for self-deprecation. Lorre and Price in particular look made to work together in this capacity. The evident physical differences between them, and the scolding master/servant relationship they invoke so well all work brilliantly here, making what could otherwise be rather hollow old jokes very funny. Timelessly funny, even, when in other hands, the old making-a-huge-noise-when-you’ve-been-asked-to-be-quiet routine might not even raise a smile (and in some hands it hasn’t). You can also see that Price in particular is enjoying the opportunity to make fun of himself, pronouncing his cruel slights against his wife with relish, gulping back his booze with a sneer and overextending his facial expressions into the realms of pantomime villain. It’s a joy to watch.

The rest of the distinguished cast are excellent, too. Karloff, playing a supporting role here as Trumbull’s father-in-law (as his physical condition wasn’t up to Basil Rathbone’s role as the dogged landlord character Mr Black) seems to be enjoying himself, too; it’s often been said that in his later years Karloff often referred to his age and frailty, implying that people kept him around on-set for the sake of it or for menial tasks at best (Christopher Lee remembers that Karloff would joke that he was retained on set ‘to sweep the floors’) – well, given the chance to play a crazy old duffer who really mishears and misunderstands everyone, he seems to have a wicked sort of mischief about him, as does Rathbone, an ambiguous fellow who throws his lines of Shakespeare into the mix with glib energy and manages to make the bard’s greatest tragedies terrifically silly – if word perfect. Then there’s the platinum blonde wife Amaryllis (Joyce Jameson) who doesn’t get very much screentime, but shows she has some comedy actress chops nonetheless with her daft wife routine and her tuneless singing gags (Les Dawson would have loved it, and who knows? Perhaps he did.)

Not bawdy or terribly sophisticated, all told, The Comedy of Terrors derives its charm from its talented cast and crew, its oddly-pleasing, familiar period setting and – I don’t mean this word in the pejorative sense which has crept in during the decades between us and this film – its camp style. It’s light Gothic entertainment through and through, a tale signifying nothing, perhaps, but an opportunity to see some of our best-beloved actors having a damned good time. There’s plenty contagious about that, and you can thank Arrow for your chance to grab a superb-looking release of this film later this week. A host of extra features also await, including an audio commentary by David Del Valle, an archive interview with Vincent Price, a feature on writer Richard Matheson, a brand new Tourneur essay by author David Cairns and a range of accompanying artwork.


The Comedy of Terrors will be released by Arrow Films on February 16th 2015.

Childhood Terrors: or How I Learned to Stop Being Scared and Love the Gore

creepers

By Stephanie Scaife

This is a story that I’ve told before, but it bears repeating. When we first got a VHS player in the mid-80s and I started frequenting the local video store, I was quickly seduced by the lurid covers of the horror section and the age restrictions that applied to these titles. I became obsessed with the idea that these films contained something that I wasn’t supposed to see, that there could be something so awful and disturbing that I’d have to wait ten plus years to find out… it was all just too much for my seven year old brain, fuelled by every possible horrible thing I could think of that might be contained in titles such as Chopping Mall, Creepers and Ghoulies. Just thinking about what they could be about made me scared, but also extremely curious.

One of the most popular playground games at around this time (at my school anyway) involved re-enacting scenes from Robocop. I’m sure an older sibling was responsible somewhere along the line, but someone had seen the film and everyone quickly became desperate to be Robocop in the game. Unfortunately for me as the only girl willing to play along, I was usually cast as the victim that Robocop saves from would-be attackers by shooting the guy between the legs, through the woman’s skirt. Of course through much exaggeration and Chinese whispers, what I heard second-hand about Robocop made it out to be the most unbelievably violent film ever made, which just made me want to see it even more. Similar games popped up around A Nightmare on Elm Street and that ilk; it’s crazy to imagine such a thing today where instead of a film being verboten you can just watch it online or on your smartphone.

howling3My young mind swam with imagined horrors, often way worse than any film ever turned out to be and soon my fascination took on the form of nagging my mother. I was unrelenting. I just had to know what was on these video tapes that I’d heard about in the playground and had been hypnotised by in the video store, which often felt sort of illicit in itself, just looking at them. Eventually she caved, and in her infinite wisdom decided the best tactic would be to rent something terrible to throw me off the scent, believing that if I was bored or unimpressed then I’d give up on my mission to watch every horror film in the store. So, what did she rent in a bid to persuade me that my fascination was unfounded? It was The Howling III: The Marsupials. This movie is awful, there’s no two ways about it, but of course I absolutely loved it! That’s where it all began and there was no going back after that. Of course, if something particularly horrible was coming up, my mum would instruct me to go to the kitchen to make her a cup of tea or some other distraction. I was undeterred though and from that day on I have ploughed my way through every horror film, anything that’s sparked any sort of controversy and anything that’s just sort of weird I could get my hands on. It’s a love that as lasted more than twenty five years and shows no signs of slowing.

I miss the anticipation though: reading about movies in magazines or seeing clips on TV and of having to really seek something out that you wanted to see. Another early example of my interest in things I wasn’t supposed to see was when moving to the States aged 13 – the first thing on my to-do list was to head to Blockbuster and rent everything that had been banned in the UK. This included A Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer and A Clockwork Orange. This was an odd experience as I mostly just discovered that they were really good movies, not some awful vision guaranteed to promote moral decay (which is what I’d imagined them to be). I’m glad that as a child there was still an element of the unknown, and that ultimately is what I have to thank for my lifelong interest in the horror genre and counter culture as a whole. Perhaps it wouldn’t have sparked my imagination to such an extent if it had been as easy as tracking down controversial or banned cinema today (which let’s face it, we all did with A Serbian Film and Grotesque).

Realising that I was actually a fairly sensible kid who knew that movies weren’t real life, as I grew up my mum was intrinsic in introducing me to firm favourites like David Cronenberg, David Lynch, John Waters… she even took me to see The Rocky Horror Picture Show live on stage for my eighth birthday! If that isn’t top parenting, then I don’t know what is. Now I’m not saying you should show The Brood to your ten year old – I was just pretty self-aware and precocious from a young age. Most kids dreamed of becoming doctors or lawyers, but all I wanted to be was Rick Baker.
What I soon found out, though, was that what I had imagined was oftentimes not so much the reality and whilst there were (and still are) many films I saw that I loved, there were very few that scared me. The films that really left a lasting impression, that truly were the stuff of nightmares, were not the Hellraisers or the Friday the 13th movies… it was movies that were actually aimed at children that scared the bejeezus out of me!

Here are the films that had the biggest, longest lasting impact on my subconscious. Tapping into something, more often than not it was the idea of a child in peril, it’s perhaps those first introductions to something tangibly relatable that terrified me the most. So whereas monsters and demons and decapitations didn’t faze me, a lost or vulnerable child almost certainly did…

5. Alice in Wonderland (1951)

Although the whole of Alice in Wonderland is actually pretty weird and creepy, it was the angry blue caterpillar that really scared me. I’m not entirely sure why but I had recurring nightmares for years about him. Who… are… you?

4. Labyrinth (1986)

Even though Labyrinth was a firm favourite of mine growing up and David Bowie’s skin tight leggings were almost single handily responsible for my sexual awakening, I was completely freaked out by the Fireys and the fact that they wanted to take Sarah’s head off!

3. Cat’s Eye (1985)

The final chapter in this portmanteau movie where a young Drew Barrymore battles against a troll scared me so much that I would check my skirting boards every night before bed, making sure that there were no tiny troll sized doors. It’s also why I insisted on having the cat sleep with me, just to be on the safe side.

2. Various Public Information Films from the 1980s

Looking back through these, it was amazing just how many from the late 80s and early 90s were cemented in my subconscious. I particularly remembered the football one where the kids are electrocuted. I certainly never went anywhere near a pylon ever again.

1. The Sandman (1992)

Now, this scared the absolute crap out of me… so much so that I literally didn’t sleep for months. I would keep my eyes tight closed listening intently for any unfamiliar sound, just in case the sandman would come and pluck my outs out during the night!

Childhood Terrors – Things That Go Bump in the Night…

ghostwatch

By Guest Contributor Claire Waddingham

About three weeks ago, in that dreary post Christmas period, I found a copy of Ghostwatch in one of the local charity shops. It was only a quid, and as it was Sunday, and I wanted a bit of nostalgia, I decided to fork out to watch it. I figured that the last time I saw it, I was 15 and was absolutely terrified by it. Now I’m 38, and reckoned that watching it on a semi-sunny afternoon, with my phone to tweet from and a cup of tea, I couldn’t possibly be scared by it. Could I?

Wrong. I’d forgotten how frightening this particular BBC classic is – and also, how scared I’d been by it as a teen. If you’re sitting there laughing, well, that’s your problem. I grew up with parents who had strict rules about what was and was not suitable for kids to watch, they respected the ratings system, and I am very glad they did. So, unlike a lot of writers here, I hadn’t seen films like Hellraiser at this point. Ghostwatch was my first truly, properly shocking horror experience…and it was on THE BBC!

If you’ve never seen Ghostwatch, here’s a brief synopsis. It’s a faux-documentary, originally broadcast on Halloween 1992, starring Michael Parkinson and Sarah Greene as TV presenters, conducting a ‘live broadcast’ of a properly haunted house. Except the house isn’t a Gothic mansion. Its a bog-standard 1930s Council semi, in a dreary street in a dreary suburban corner of London. Anyone could live there. You could. And the victims of this haunting aren’t a crabby old couple. They are a single mum, and her two teenage daughters. In retrospect, this was quite groundbreaking – single mums were the hate figures of the Conservative government of the day – the idea that single mums could be harassed, careworn, and trying to do the best for their children in difficult circumstances was a view the media preferred to ignore, and this particular single mum was at the end of her tether with her hideous haunted house. Jokes about the awful early 90s decorating soon dropped away as the real plot began to bite.

The hauntings themselves were unveiled as the 90 minute programme wore on. Greene was in the house as a live reporter, whilst Parkinson was in the studio with an expert parapsychologist. Back in the house, some very weird, and frankly, horrible things unfolded. Banging, thumping noises. Strange wails. An eerie presence. Scratches on the body of one of the children. And a child speaking in a voice that was not her own. Even at 38, knowing full well it was a scripted drama that had been framed to look like a live broadcast, it’s still pretty horrific. Or maybe I’m a big wuss…

ghostwatch2

I can honestly say I did not want to go to sleep that night. Maybe I do have an over active imagination, but the ending was especially terrifying – although my dear father did lighten the mood by shouting “Thank God! No more Going Live!” (which Greene presented at the time!) but the things that happened – they scared me. Mainly because they indicated to my teenage self that there was something on the other side, but also that delivered effectively, supernatural horror can be very frightening indeed.

Being a historian, I did some research. I found out that the shocks in Ghostwatch were based upon the infamous Enfield poltergeist hauntings of the late 1970s, which to this day still divide and baffle researchers and those with an interest in the paranormal. I confess that I do like the type of ghost hunting programmes filmed as ‘real’, although the Americans leave us in the dust for scares. And, crucially, Ghostwatch turned me onto horror films – Candyman and Hellraiser are two supernatural shockers that I absolutely love, and I came to them in the aftermath of a BBC drama. Oh, and don’t forget the original Poltergeist – a real horror classic that despite its rubbish sequels and dreaded Hollywood remake is still terrifying, 35 years on.

So, I can honestly say that shocking as it was to me as a teenager – and only having watched it once again 23 years later – Ghostwatch helped spur me onto some absolute gems of horror. Its legacy has stayed with me and helped to mould my tastes in horror cinema. In my book forget flesh eating torture porn gonzos – the elegant chills of the supernatural get me every time.

Childhood Terrors: Meet The Stonewalkers

stonewalkers

By Keri O’Shea

As I alluded to in the introduction to our Childhood Terrors series, the bookshelf has long been (and hopefully still is) a formidable presence in children’s lives – a rich seam of ideas at the threshold of a room, teeming with characters and forces which command real power. A book is, all at the same time, wonderfully simple and wonderfully complex – a glimpse into imagined worlds, worlds which have a particular resonance when they have the ability to scare. One book which had such a hold on me is Vivien Alcock’s The Stonewalkers, a chance find in a provincial library in the depths of the Welsh valleys…

The first thing to say, although in a feature such as this it may well go without saying, is that The Stonewalkers is a wonderfully frightening story. It was read to me by my mother when I was seven or eight years old and, thinking about it with the full power of hindsight, it wasn’t the best choice for a bedtime story. It stopped me sleeping well for weeks – a fact I hid, because I wanted to find out what happened. I found out in later years that while I was hiding how scared I was, so was my mother! That’s one of the great strengths of this novella: it gets straight down to that archetypal horror of portraits or statues, these great immovables, coming to life. Children recognise and adults remember that awful ‘what if?’ at the heart of this tale. This is a fast-paced book which delights in delicious understatement: Alcock’s economical and thereby incisive style allows a lot of scope for a child’s (and an adult’s) imagination to play with the macabre goings-on, with lots of potential to create some tangible and terrifying mental images of the events as they unfold. I’m very surprised that The Stonewalkers has never been brought to the screen; some of its scenes are as clear to me as if they had been, and it would surely make for an engaging horror movie.

Poppy Brown is a lonely twelve year old, and not automatically a sympathetic character. Renowned as a fibber and wary of other kids, she keeps herself to herself – often spending her time pouring out her woes, punctuated by the proverbs she has so hopefully learned by heart, to ‘Belladonna’, a statue of a girl in the grounds of her mother’s employer’s house. Using a length of a chain she finds in the cellar of the house one day, she attaches it to Belladonna’s ankle like a piece of jewellery. Then, the hot July day gives way to a thunderstorm: Belladonna is hit by lightning, the metal chain drawing the strike. She’s knocked from her plinth but, somehow, the stone girl comes alive.

At first, Belladonna is benign, and Poppy is keen to prove that, this time at least, she isn’t a little liar. She entices Belladonna back to the house and ushers her into a room to wait…where Belladonna sees the stone bust of a girl. Touching her own neck, Belladonna;s self-awareness sees her move from friendly innocence to suspicion, fear – and terrible rage. Finding her way into the cellar, she finds a coil of the same chain which was instrumental in bringing her to life, and she takes it, escaping into the world outside.

In some ways an alternate spin on The Boy Who Cried Wolf, The Stonewalkers also skirts close to the Frankenstein story, albeit refracted through the eyes and actions of a group of terrified children – one of whom definitely didn’t mean to be a creator and is at first such an uncongenial character that, as Belladonna’s first model of humanity, she is bound to cause problems. For the statues aren’t evil – they’re emulatory, curious, trying to act like the organic beings they resemble but aren’t. Some of them seem to learn, however, adding a layer of poignancy to the end sequences of an unsettling and memorable tale. Poppy, too, has the opportunity to develop and grow.

And well she might, considering the way the growing army of statues begins to behave and how hard she has to work to literally save her own skin. I said that Belladonna was curious, in a very human manner – well, when you think about some of the behaviours justified by human ‘curiosity’, it shouldn’t surprise you that Belladonna soon shows she has the capacity to act viciously, and many of the scenes here are pure horror – showing to readers an unflinching, unsettling menace, the acting-out of that special sort of helplessness which stems from knowing utterly that you are physically vulnerable to something bigger, heavier, even more belligerent than you are. It’s been the mainstay of horror cinema for years, and it’s here in abundance too – in a book, let’s not forget – that is about kids, as well as targeted at kids.

However, perhaps more in line with children’s literature (and even a lot of horror cinema), for all its scares – the scares which stopped me sleeping – by the close of The Stonewalkers, there’s space enough for a restrained, but happy ending. This is something of a counterweight to all of the nightmarish images which precede it…of living statues, bathed in moonlight, purposefully and slowly crossing the moors…though this ending never, fully, dissipates the terror of all this. The Stonewalkers achieves a great deal in its few pages, and it continues to stand out as one of the seminal reading experiences of my childhood.

Childhood Terrors: Voices from the Dead…

record label

By Guest Contributor Helen Creighton

Published in the early 1980s, The Unexplained – Mysteries of Mind, Space and Time was a magazine perfectly designed to impress the young and credulous mind. It looked grown-up and vaguely ‘scientific’, although it was the absolute opposite. It avoided crass, splashy headlines and sensationalism for lengthy, scholarly-looking articles, laden with the kinds of anecdotes from far-flung parts of the globe (OK, the USA) that suggested a good deal of journalistic research (as opposed to pure fantasy and urban myth) had gone into their writing. Best still, it was priced at a whole 60p an issue!

0xPyEThe Unexplained set out to cover every aspect of the paranormal and the mysterious – and as such, its range was wide in scope. Some subjects – such as alien visitation and UFOs, simply fascinated. UFOs and aliens – at least until Whitley Strieber put out his book Communion and the still ludicrously credulous and eager-for-novelty teenage me ate it up with saucer-eyes and an endearing lack of scepticism – were fun! Other subjects, such as ESP, inspired us to conduct our own fruitless experiments using playing cards and drawing books in the hopes that we too were psychic and special (we weren’t). An issue devoted to the alleged true phenomena that is Spontaneous Human Combustion, complete with gritty-looking crime scene photos, made me curious but rather uneasy…

Others still put the absolute frighteners on us (Okay, me) in a way that still lingers to this day. I’m talking about that Voices From the Dead record.

Voices From the Dead was a lovely lime green flexi-disc that came free with an issue of Unexplained in the early 1980s. A little research now tells me the original recording was made by one Konstantin Raudive and included with his 1971 book ‘Breakthrough – An Amazing Experiment in Electronic Communication with the Dead’. The idea was that Mr. Raudive had recorded the voices of dead people, including a few famous ones such as Winston Churchill, using super-special, cutting edge, high frequency recording equipment.

Of course he had. Anyway, at the time I couldn’t wait to hear such a miraculous recording. I grabbed my sister for the inaugural broadcast, set the disc on the turntable (a huge early 60s thing that hummed, buzzed and slowly overheated into uselessness on a regular basis, lending a certain character to the process of playing our vinyls that nothing has ever quite matched since) and we set the needle down. Within a couple of minutes I had run from the room, hands pressed over my ears, shrieking, “Turn it off! Turn it off! Turn it off!”

It turned out that the recording comprised a mixture of horrible static white noise with bursts of eerie, scratchy voices, moving about the sound picture in a way that immediately burrowed its way past all my rational filters into whichever part of the brain doles out excruciating, adrenaline-soaked fear. The stentorian, BBC tones of the presenters lent everything an air of respectability and seriousness that made it all utterly convincing and unquestionably real to me. It gave me a fear of strange, disembodied voices that last for a very long time.

Today, via the internet and an ever more advanced array of sound recording technology, we live in a world where the dead can speak to us via EVP – or ‘Electronic Voice Phenomena’ – a phenomenon which has a dedicated base of believers, all of whom can talk to one another and share their ‘evidence’ on a whole host of websites. It wasn’t always the case – and as creepy as some of the EVP recordings can surely be, they have nothing on the singular experience of the Voices From the Dead vinyl.

Anyway, I wouldn’t go downstairs in the dark at night for years without thinking of that record. If you’re unacquainted, check out a sample of the recording below…