Cannes 2012 Preview: Jen and Sylvia Soska's 'American Mary'

A short but sweet review from Nia Edwards-Behi

If I may indulge in some flagrant cliché abuse, the Soska Sisters are not just going places, but they’re paving the way to an exciting, vital and game-changing career in genre filmmaking. The powerhouses behind Dead Hooker in a Trunk have made their second film, American Mary, which has received its first screening at the Marche du Film at this year’s Cannes Film Festival. The film stars Katharine Isabelle as Mary, a broke medical student who finds herself mired in a bizarre world of underground surgery.

Mary is a completely different beast to Dead Hooker. Where Dead Hooker is a loving tribute to B-movies and grindhouse cinema, Mary is a stylish, artful and darkly funny tragedy. This difference is the Soskas’ masterstroke – even the most doubting spectator would struggle to deny the absolute versatility on display between the two films.

Mary is a significantly darker film, too. For all its laughs – and boy, are there laughs – Mary is a particularly discomforting tragedy, the Soskas’ passion for interesting storytelling as evident as their passion for genre filmmaking. The story is filled with twisted yet likeable characters, with standout performances from Katherine Isabelle as Mary and Tristan Risk as Beatress Johnson. Risk is captivating as the bizarre Beatress, with many of the film’s funniest moments emerging from her quirks. Isabelle owns the role of Mary completely and consistently confirms what an impressive actress she is. The supporting talent rounds off a cast of desirable undesirables, all monsters in their own ways – and particularly entertaining is the Soskas’ own, incredibly memorable, cameo turn. The film is an impressive feast of visuals, from grotesque prosthetic work to beautiful set design. Mary’s world may seem unfamiliar or far-fetched, but it is wholly believable.

The work on display in American Mary is that of seasoned, mature filmmakers. That this is only a sophomore effort demonstrates the absolute talent harnessed by the Soska sisters. This is the most original film I’ve seen for a very long time, and I can’t help but feel that the Soskas have the potential to lead the way in an enlivening of genre filmmaking. American Mary deserves an incredibly wide release; its story as accessible to non-genre fans as it is satisfying for those of us who love the darker parts of cinema, and impressive for anyone who claims to be a fan of cinema.

Keep your eyes peeled for news on American Mary’s future release.

Warrior Week: Steph’s Top 5 Tips to Ensure That You Survive the Apocalypse and its Aftermath

by Stephanie Scaife

*spoilers ahead*

Okay, so let’s not get too pernickety about naming sub-genres here. There are always a lot of grumblings over what’s apocalyptic, post-apocalyptic and dystopian, however one thing is clear regardless – the world has gone to shit and you’re going to have to fight for survival and adapt to your new (and often hazardous) surroundings one way or another. If there is anything I’ve learned from the movies it’s that honing your skills and either becoming a warrior or learning adept skills of warrior evasion are what’s key, regardless of whether you’re living in the aftermath of world war three or in an alternate history dystopian New York City. So as part of Brutal As Hell’s Warrior Week I’m going to explore some of your potential choices for when that time finally comes, so pay close attention and make sure to carefully adhere to my essential survival tips.

5 – Learn to Drive and Start Stockpiling Fuel

If you want to survive in the post-apocalyptic wasteland then you’ll need to a) be able to cover as much ground as possible and b) be able to out run any pursuers. The key to this, clearly, is to be able to drive and drive well. Picking up a few tips from a mechanic could also be useful, especially when modifying your vehicle of choice. You could go for motorbikes adorned with glowing skulls, as favoured by the Bronx Warriors in the far off future of 1990 where the Bronx in NYC has been officially declared no man’s land and is ruled by The Riders, a tough motorcycle gang.

What I wouldn’t recommend however is rollerblades as a mode of transportation, as seen in Prayer of the Rollerboys, where a gang of white supremacists terrorise Corey Haim in a futuristic LA and market an addictive drug that renders non-Caucasian users infertile (and yes, this is a real film).

Now, you could also do a lot worse than the supercharged V-8 Pursuit Special that Max drives in The Road Warrior. A modified version of the car he drives in the first Mad Max with a large gas tank (useful when you never know where you next supply of gas is coming from). But as you can see in the clip below what you really want and what will give you the greatest chance of survival is a giant armoured tanker truck!

4 – Pick a Theme and a Catchy Nickname

If there’s one thing I’ve learned about the potential dystopian futures it’s that creativity is never dampened by difficult living situations, it fact in many instances it seems to take precedence. Not only do we develop a greater sense of style (see number 2) but we also get pretty inventive when it comes to names and themes for our warriors. Take The Warriors for example, set in a dystopian vision of New York City where the numerous gangs rule the streets. To succeed at this you need your gang to be distinguishable, this means laying claim to a particular stake of land, a particular style must be uniformly adopted, signature weapons must be wielded and nicknames must be assigned.

Of course we have our titular anti-heroes The Warriors, who wear leather vests with The Warriors logo emblazoned on the back (a winged skull), a knife, Molotov cocktail or just plain good old fashioned fists are their weapons of choice. Their leader Swan may not have a particularly manly name if ever there was one, but I still wouldn’t want to get on the wrong side of him.

Then we have (my personal favourite) The Baseball Furies. The Furies never speak and clearly they’re a few bases short of a homerun, making them one of the most feared gangs in New York City. They dress in baseball uniforms, leather baseball caps and brandish uniquely painted faces and are more than a little treacherous when it comes to wielding a bat. If you’ve played the videogame then you’ll know that they are lead by a man named Cobb who wields an even deadlier dual-baseball bat that he uses to fire balls at his enemies with deadly accuracy.

The Lizzies are a kick ass all-female gang that inhabit Union Square, they like to keep their look fairly subtle so as not to draw too much attention and to enable them to lure their(predominantly) male victims to the confines of their hangout before pulling guns and knives on their unsuspecting victims. They are led by a tough broad by the name of Starr and these are some ladies that you do not want to go messing with as they are clearly able to hold their own in male dominated gang warfare.

Far less cool are the somewhat inappropriately named The Punks, dressed in dungarees and roller skates these guys really should have reconsidered when coming up with a theme. The whole inbred farmer look isn’t exactly helped by the fact that the members have names like Hog and Lumpy who like to hang around in subway bathrooms late at night.

So get your thinking cap on, round up your toughest friends and get familiar with some easily accessible weaponry, because it’s going to be a tough world out there and if you want to be a warrior you’re going to have to learn how to come out and play.

3 – Kill Kevin Costner Before it’s Too Late…

It will mean pre-empting both The Postman and Waterworld and thus ensuring that neither were prophetic, because really the world of the future would most certainly be a better place without Kevin Costner delivering mail and/or evolving to have webbed feet. I don’t know about you, but that is definitely not the post-apocalypse of my dreams. If the icebergs melt then I’m more than happy to accept Dennis Hopper as my warrior overlord. So let’s just nip this one in the bud right now shall we?

2 – Change Your Style

Jeans and a t-shirt just ain’t gonna cut it after the apocalypse. Especially if you want to be a bad ass. The general rule also appears to be the fewer the clothes the better, so prepare to do a few push-ups along with the day-to-day chore of survival…

Option A (Female)

If there was anything to learn from Doomsday (besides how not to make a movie) then it was that cleavage and face paint is paramount. You’d also better start those leather work classes now and stockpiling nail polish and eye liner if you wish to complete this look – that is unless a few Avon ladies end up getting quarantined in Scotland with you…

Option B (Female)

The Tank Girl look is far more achievable I feel; it’s definitely a more of a scavenged lets-see-what-I-find-lying-around look which will accommodate the lack of free time you’ll have whilst fighting for survival against Malcolm McDowell and Ice-T dressed as a kangaroo…

Option C (Female)

I feel that ultimately the Aunty Entity look is the perhaps best choice for all concerned. I mean just check out those chainmail suspenders! Let’s not worry about how uncomfortable it may be to be dressed entirely in chainmail in the Australian outback and instead focus on how awesome you’d look whilst hosting those gladiatorial battles in the Thunderdome arena…

Option A (Male)

Snake Plissken. Need I say anymore? I don’t think so.

Option B (Male)

Mohawk – check, feathers – check, bondage gear – check… well then, I think you’re all set to lead your warrior motorcycle gang into battle. Just don’t forget Humungus.

Option C (Male)

If I was a dude and I lived in a dystopian future over run with Exterminator warriors then I’d totally dress like this, hell even if I were a dude right now I’d totally dress like this. Seriously guys, this is clearly the way forward.

1 – Consider Becoming a Cannibal

Let’s face it, if you’re going get through the hard times ahead your morals will to have to go on standby. Indefinite standby. Your first option is what I like to call The Opportunist, which is exemplified in the only redeeming scene from the otherwise abysmal Hughes Brothers movie The Book of Eli in which Michael Gambon and Frances de la Tour play an elderly couple having survived by effectively booby trapping their house, keeping a large stash of automatic weapons to hand and pretty much just killing and eating anybody who shows up on their doorstep. Admittedly The Opportunist is a rare breed as they generally fly solo or in small groups.

This is where getting yourself into a gang becomes an option, making you The Savvy Cannibal. In John Hillcoat’s adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s The Road we have a particular breed of Savvy Cannibal – roaming the streets in gangs on armoured trucks rounding up meat, because what the Savvy Cannibal knows is that the key to success is to keep a readily available supply of fresh meat available. There’s little point in killing someone outright when you’d have no way of storing all that precious food, so instead what you do is keep your food supply alive, taking a limb here and a limb there (of course it’s important to cauterise the to avoid that Sunday roast you got planned for the next weekend bleeding out). The Savvy Cannibal also has an appreciation for tender meats, meaning that fertile woman must be impregnated to provide a constant supply of newborn meat, human veal if you will, which if the book is to be believed is best served spit roasted immediately after birth.

My personal favourite cannibal is the The Animal Lover. Imagine you live in a world where you must constantly evade gangs of marauders, warrior mutants known as Screamers, and crazy androids with only your misanthropic, telepathic dog for company, as can be seen in L.Q. Jones’ A Boy and His Dog. You finally meet the girl of your dreams (something rare in a world where women are few and far between) and she wants to take you into a city fashioned underground where everyone wears mime make-up and men are farmed for their semen in a bid to up the population. Then after escaping from the crazy underground city with your girlfriend you find your beloved dog close to starvation – what do you do? The answer of course, is what any sane person would do; you kill your girlfriend so that your dog can eat and in doing so provide my favourite ending to any film ever.

Of course if all of civilization hasn’t completely crumpled and a dystopian utopia is possible, then you might want to consider becoming The Business Cannibal and investing strongly in Soylent Green…

 

Warrior Week: Annie & Keri's Top VILFs (as in V for Viking…)

A Labour of love from Annie Riordan and Keri O’Shea

Annie: Summer, 2003. Pirates Of The Caribbean had only been in theaters for a month and I was already sick as shit of Jolly Roger eye patches and “Talk Like A Pirate” day. I mean, sure – it was a cool movie and I’d enjoyed it, but the sudden and inexplicable worship of All Things Pirate which had exploded in its wake had completely passed me by. Pirates just don’t do it for me. If I want to watch a whisper thin guy prance about in knee high boots, puffy shirts, bigass hats and shitloads of jewelry, I’ll watch Flyguy in “I’m Gonna Git You Sucka.” Pirates do not instill any fear in me. The idea of going up against one threatens me about as much as the thought of being bitchslapped to death by Estelle Getty. 2003 marked the first time I ever won an argument using just one word, when a young coworker – with visions of Johhny Depp unbuckling his swash dancing in her head, no doubt – tried her articulated best to convince me that pirates were the most fearsome badasses ever to circumnavigate the globe. I waited until she’d finished and simply said: “Vikings.”

I saw the realization hit her, saw the mental image of Johnny Depp in his swishy little outfit getting his rum-soaked ass kicked by a seven foot tall Norseman whose beard alone probably outweighed Depp by forty pounds or more. She promptly shut up. Yeah, that’s right. Hammer of the Gods, bitch.

That said however, there is a serious lack of movies about Vikings. Edit: GOOD movies about Vikings. And I don’t even count the ones made before the 80s because Kirk Douglas looks about as much like a fucking Viking as my ass does. Vikings did not have Gillette razors, Brylcreem or shiny pectoral oil, okay? They were hairy and stinky and nobody fucked with them. They could pick you up with one hand and crush you against their mighty foreheads like beer cans. They were not pretty little bitches in foofoo fabrics. When they wanted a new outfit, they plowed up a moose’s ass, ate it from the inside out and just wore it when they were done. Hey, you thought Peter Steele had a big dick? Viking dicks were taller than Peter Steele wearing platform shoes. Vikings were never meant to be portrayed as Sexy or Hawt…but some of them were anyway.

Gunnar, Pathfinder (Clancy Brown)

Keri: Ah, Pathfinder. The fact that I can happily objectify your actors means I can steadfastly ignore the anti-Viking bias in this frankly substance-free, but often picturesque movie. In Pathfinder’s world, y’see, the Norsemen are all degenerate barbarians, closer to orcs than men, and – significantly – they’re the ones speaking a subtitled language here, while the Native Americans they encounter are all jolly nice and speak English to boot. English! But anyway: cartoon strip rendition of Apocalypto this may well be, but I’m about to overlook any bias against the world’s first naval superpower by focusing on Gunnar, played by Clancy Brown. Yeah, I could have gone for main man Karl Urban, the Norse guy brought up by Native Americans, but to be perfectly frank, I’m beyond the time in my life where I can enthuse over beardless novices. He’s just a bit polished-looking for me. Gunnar, on the other hand, is a man you’d want on your side if your society collapsed. Hewn rock with a beard hanging off it. Yes please. (The brick outhouse that is Ralf Möller, otherwise known as the huge German guy in Gladiator, is in this too – playing Ulfar. But I didn’t want to be too greedy, you know?)

Snorri, 1066 (Søren Byder)

Keri: 1066, made for and screened by the UK’s Channel 4, is probably as far as it’s possible to get from Pathfinder whilst simultaneously having anything to do with Vikings. And why? Well, the historical accuracy of 1066 is just a wonder to behold. Although the characters are fictitious, the circumstances enacted here are meticulously researched, and 1066 went as far as hiring actors from the parts of the world where their respective characters hailed – so Snorri here is a bona fide Norseman, Søren Byder, and bloody marvellous he is too. What really comes across in 1066 is a sense of what both the Norwegian and the English armies were fighting for – there’s no demonisation required. Invader, yes, but Snorri is depicted as articulate, loyal and smart (fluent in English, folks) as well as physically strong and brave, with good reasons for deciding to cross the sea. On a far more shallow level, that braid? Hot. Gives me something to hang onto!

Volnard, Severed Ways: the Norse Discovery of America (Fiore Tedesco)

Keri: Oh, my. With the greatest of respect to actor (and also writer, director and producer) Tony Stone, I could look at Fiore Tedesco all day. Severed Ways has had its fair share of detractors, I understand why this is, but I have to say I’m not one of them. This is one bold indie film in my book, and although I was perfectly happy before I’d seen a Viking toilet break in all its glory, I really liked the (other) atmosphere and aesthetics here. And I don’t just mean Volnard, either. Get your minds out of the gutter. When I wasn’t making lewd comments to myself as I sat alone at my laptop, like the sad person I am, I was noticing the beautiful use of natural light (and natural light only), the striking landscapes and the ambient metal soundtrack. Essentially, if you have a place in your cold, kvult hearts for black metal, this is like a scenic postcard crossed with a love letter from that genre of music. That suits me just fine…also, how do you say ‘marry me’ in Old Norse? Just wondering.

Skeld the Superstitious, The 13th Warrior (Richard Bremmer)

Annie: What a badass. Skeld is a fiery redhead, and the twelfth warrior to volunteer to fight alongside Prince Buliwyf (read Beowulf) in the far north. With his heavy duty facial tattoos and icy, unblinking glare, Skeld is not someone you’d be naturally inclined to fuck with. He’s got a nasty temper to back up his intimidating aura, and he not only knows how to use a sword, he knows how to make them too. Skeld is also played by Richard Bremmer, a woefully underrated actor who, once upon a time, played a bad guy named Voldemort in a little movie called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Way more badass than Ralph Fiennes, just saying.

One Eye, Valhalla Rising (Mads Mikkelsen)

Annie: You might be able to catch a Viking, lock him in a cage and make him do your bidding for a while. But he will never be your bitch. And he WILL find a way to escape. And when I say “escape” I mean “kill everyone who wronged him in the most viciously brutal manner possible and then calmly stroll of into the sunset like the most badass mutherfucker in the world.” That’s pretty much what One Eye does. He never speaks, he never smiles, he never stops fighting. He’s also covered in ink and spends a good lot of the movie stripped to the waist and rolling around in the mud with other guys. Score for Norse Porn! His hair is a mess, his face is fucked up and you just know that the inside of his clothes probably smell like old bacon and ass, but he’s played by Mads Mikkelsen, therefore you’d fuck him no matter what. I even know hetero guys who would fuck him, if only to absorb some of his badassery.

Buliwyf, The 13th Warrior (Vladmimir Kulich)

Annie: Blonds aren’t really my type, but there’s no denying that the six foot four inch tall, wide as a wine cask Prince Buliwyf is Awesome Incarnate. He’s a goddamned Viking prince, swathed in animal skins and wielding a sword bigger than a Redwood tree. He’s grim and serious and cold as stone, yet he’s also wise and compassionate, likes dogs and short walks on the beach. He also knows how to stand in the prow of a longship and yell “Odin!” into the fog like a super boss. He even puts up with Antonio Banderas’s whiny shit longer than most people would have. That, my friends, is supernatural. I think even Thor Himself would have smacked the shit out of Tony much earlier on.

So all you little pirate fangirls – you keep your swaggery little pseudo-sailors, your wimpy Caribbean beaches and your goddamned rum. Me and Keri – aka Norse Whores Inc. – will be drinking mead out of a horn, listening to Ulver and playing “hide the hammer” with some barrel chested badasses beneath a mound of animal skins in the mighty pine forests of Scandinavia. Gå og pul deg selv!

 

Warrior Week: Fulci Does Sword & Sorcery in ‘Conquest’

by Ben Bussey

As I think we’ve established by now, the 80s were a boom period for the sword and sorcery genre; indeed, in a way it’s hard to think of the genre existing before that time. But obviously that’s not the case. Tales of gallant knights or otherwise courageous swordsmen doing battle with hissable villains, often with a touch of that old black magic involved, are as old as the written word; and such tales had invariably made their way onto the screen long before Conan the Barbarian showed up. I think what makes the 80s stand apart from that which came before – and most of what has come since – is that they demonstrated that stories like this aren’t just kids’ stuff. The 80s sword and sorcery films took those epic, fantastical, life-or-death adventures and really emphasised the life-or-death element. The tough guys were really tough, and the bad guys were really bad, and they didn’t shy away from showing what happens when a broadsword strikes a body, or what happens when a rugged hero hooks up with a swooning maiden.

Or, to consider the matter in more practical terms: 80s sword and sorcery crafted a formula for popular films which could be made relatively inexpensively and allowed scope for plenty of perverse and gory goings-on. Someone had to take it to the logical extreme; and when you think of it like that, it was pretty much a foregone conclusion that Lucio Fulci would try the genre on for size.

For better or worse, Conquest can most definitely be said to stand apart in the body of fantasy cinema, for few, if any films have taken such a prosaic set-up for a sword-swinging adventure and produced something so surreal, excessive and unpleasant. But once again, this is Fulci we’re talking about; surrealism, excess and unpleasantness are part and parcel. While it may be an entry in a genre he had not previously worked in and would not revisit, Fulci’s unmistakable claw marks are all over Conquest; like all his most notable works, it’s an extreme film which will inevitably inspire extreme reactions. For one such as myself who appreciates why Fulci is popular but has never quite been on board, Conquest is an unusual viewing experience, as infuriating as it is delightful; but, perhaps most importantly, it is distinctive.

Again, like most Fulci films the plot is hardly the most important thing and does not bear much scrutiny, but what the hell: there’s a young archer named Ilius (Andrea Occhipinti, also in Fulci’s New York Ripper), who seems to be from some ethereal plane of existence, possibly even the land of the gods. Seeking some kind of coming of age/ journey into manhood experience, he enters a particularly messed-up section of the mortal realm, where the cave-dwelling common folk are at the mercy of the evil sorceress Ohkren (Sabrina Siani, credited here as Sabrina Sellers). Ohkren claims to control the rising and setting of the sun, and as such insists that the land would perish without her. This, it seems, is how she justifies sending her army of werewolves to wreak her sadistic wrath on the commoners as of when she feels like it; this includes a spot of cannibalism. Oh, and did I mention that aside from a solid gold mask, a spangly G-string, a big snake and a layer of baby oil, Ohkren is stark bollock naked at all times?

After a suitably gruesome appetiser (and boy is it gruesome), Ohkren goes off into some sort of drug induced trance and has a vision of a man that might be the cause of her doom; an archer, equipped with a magic bow that fires arrows of pure light. Not being too keen on the idea of being killed by a laser beam arrow, she sends out the wolfmen (well, frankly they look more like shaggy dogs) to find the man in question and snuff him. Fitting the description, our young hero Ilius soon finds himself under attack, outnumbered and up shit creek, until help unexpectedly arrives in the sturdy form of Mace (Jorge Rivero), a lone barbarian sporting what seems to be a Flintstones-ish variation on nunchucks. The seasoned warrior and the young wannabe team up, and obviously a confrontation with the big bad Ohkren is in the cards.

Yes, you could take the bare bones of that premise, downplay the druggy cannibal stuff and slap a dress (or at the very least a bra) on Ohkren, and the resulting film could easily have been prime-time family viewing. But, as well we know, that ain’t how Fulci rolls… so on with the splattering heads, torn limbs and spilled guts. By Fulci standards it’s hardly his nastiest work, but for the genre it’s quite the eye-opener. Likewise the sexualisation of the villainous Ohkren; sure, many other sword and sorcery movies boasted plentiful female nudity (take The Warrior and the Sorceress, in which Maria Sorcas is bare-chested for the duration), but here it feels like every other scene features Ohkren writhing on the ground in narcotic/sexual ecstasy, with her oh-so-symbolic snake slithering all over her very-nearly nude form. Given that her unabashed hedonism goes hand in hand with her villainy, by contrast with the honourable bond that forms between Mace and Ilius, and it’s not hard to read a misogynistic and/or homoerotic subtext into Conquest (female sexuality = evil, male bonding = good). However, it’s even easier to sit back in bemusement and wonder what was going on in the minds of all concerned while they made this oddity, not least at some of the astonishingly feeble special effects; as if the piss-poor werewolf make-up wasn’t enough, just look at what they try to pass off as arrows.

With its weird, soft-focus cinematography and a typically throbbing synth score from Claudio Simonetti, Conquest is custom-made midnight movie material, designed to have that hazy dreamlike quality of the intoxicated or otherwise semi-conscious. It’s probably best viewed in that state; in the cold light of day, it may well wind up looking a wee bit silly. But hey, don’t we all…

Warrior Week: 'She' May Be The Film You Can’t Forget…

by Ben Bussey

“I have mastered your god! Accept me! NOW!”

As film fans in the 20teens, just how often nowadays do we truly feel like we’ve made a discovery? Here in the wonderful world of cyberspace – with IMDb, Wikipedia and the proliferation of blogs and fan sites of which your beloved Brutal As Hell is but one – it seems that everyone and his dog can be a movie nerd now. With just a click of a mouse you can find out all there is to know about every weird, silly and obscure film under the sun, from every last plot detail to the names of the best boy and the key grip. Pah! In my day you had to earn your nerdiness! You had to venture out to obscure corners of town in search of musty comic shops and film memorabilia flea markets, where shelves bent under the weight of pirate VHS copies of outlawed European horror films! You had to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with over-or-underweight men riddled with acne and humming with body odour, trawling through magazine racks in search of strange and enticing publications with lurid names and mostly-naked pictures of Brinke Stevens on the cover! None of this new-fangled Google and Netflix malarkey…

Okay, now that I’ve got that ageing geek Luddite diatribe out of my system, back to the point: discovery. That sense that you’ve found something amazing which the masses are not aware of; it’s so pivotal to the cult film experience, and it’s something we seem to be losing nowadays. But hear me, brothers and sisters, it is not gone completely. I can say this with authority, as I have recently had the pleasure of seeing for the first time a film that I hitherto knew nothing about, only to discover one of the most entertaining low-budget fantasy films I’ve seen in a long time; this is a film so gloriously unhinged and outlandish, I’m truly astonished it doesn’t have more of a reputation. I’m talking about writer/director Avi Nesher’s 1982 post-apocalyptic action adventure extraordinaire, She.

(Cue the outcry of umpteen film geeks older and more knowledgeable than I, decrying me as a young pretender for not having seen this film sooner…)

On adding She to my Lovefilm list (alright, so I do Lovefilm, guess I’m not that much of a luddite), all I knew was that it starred Sandahl Bergman – true love of Conan/tyrannical lesbian nemesis of Red Sonja, whose virtues I have already sung here – and that it was said to be a futuristic variation on the classic H. Rider Haggard novel which previously formed the basis of the 1965 Hammer film with Ursula Andress. True enough, Nesher’s film opens with a quote from Haggard and cites the inspiration of the novel in the end credits; however, beyond that the connection is so tenuous, it borders on non-existent. The eponymous She (actually called Ayesha in the novel and the Hammer film) is worshipped as a goddess and is allegedly immortal, the secret of which immortality is bathing in a magical power source, a pillar of fire in the novel, a rock-lined hot tub here (thereby providing the requisite excuse for a nude scene). And… that’s about it. I’ll admit it’s been a while since I’ve read the novel, but I’m buggered if I can see any more of H. Rider Haggard in Nesher’s narrative. And Haggard isn’t the only conspicuous absentee; there’s also the matter of logic, good taste, and restraint…

The plot, such as it is, goes a little something like this: at an unspecified future date, ’23 years after the Cancellation’ apparently, nomad siblings Tom (David Goss), Dick (Harrison Muller) and Hari (Elena Weiderman) – yes, you read those names correctly – find themselves under attack from a tribe of neo-barbarians called the Norks (heheheheheh!), who tend to dress in curious combinations of S&M gear, suits of armour and sports clothing with swastikas drawn on. Hari is promptly stolen away by the Norks (heheheheheh! It doesn’t get old) to their distant kingdom; meanwhile, the shell-shocked Tom and Dick unwittingly drift into the province of She. Naturally, She and her matriarchal military rule with an iron fist, and the daily duties of the populace comprise of standing in what looks like the National Portrait Gallery, bowing and chanting the name of She while chained men in loincloths wait for She herself to emerge and pick one of them as a sacrificial subject. Or something along those lines; I don’t know, it’s never really explained, much as how it’s never explained what The Cancellation was, or why She is venerated as a goddess. Anyway, Tom and Dick cross paths with She and her warrior women, which as you might expect doesn’t work out too well for the boys: Dick gets chained up with the pigs, whilst Tom gets forced to walk blindfolded down a path strewn with big metal spikes, which scratch and stab at his rock-hard abs. However, once they learn that She is the only one who knows the way to the realm of the Norks, they set about abducting her and forcing her to help them rescue Hari. Surprisingly, once She is in their custody they find the goddess/dictator quite forthcoming in offering her assistance, at least in part because it seems she has the hots for Tom. And why not; he’s a beefy, blonde, He-Man-looking kinda guy. Anyway, with She’s right-hand woman Shandra (Quin Kessler) tagging along to make it a foursome, they set off across the wilderness to Norksville.

And what manner of misadventures do they encounter along the way, I hear you ask? Well, there are mutant lepers, vampires, a telekinetic god-king, a Frankenstein robot, and a big burly hairy guy who appears to be a bit gender-confused… and that is to name but a few of the colourful adversaries our heroes encounter. They will do battle, face torture, get magically spun upside down, be imprisoned, don disguises, break free, do battle once more… and so it goes for just over an hour and a half of episodic, swashbuckling, dystopian fun. Most of said action plays out to the sound of early 80s fist-in-the-air hard rock, and synths from none other than the progmeister Rick Wakeman. And from the look of things, it’s all done on a budget slightly less than Kevin Costner’s hairdressing expenses on Waterworld.

No bones about it, She is an extremely silly film; but it’s the greatest, rarest breed of silliness, the kind that, just when you’re sure the film has got as absurd as it’s going to get, it proves you wrong again and again. There’s a madcap, make-it-up-as-we-go-along feel to proceedings that will surely convince many viewers that She is unknowing trash, belonging in the so-bad-it’s-good category at best. Not so, say I. Look at the character names Tom, Dick and Hari. Look at the unrepentant valley girl mannerisms of Quin Kessler, and the goofy antics of Harrison Muller. Take the extravagant theatricality of the supporting cast, from the mutant lepers to the toga-clad romantics to the mad scientists and beyond. Then there’s the laugh-out-loud bridge confrontation that could quite easily have substituted for the Black Knight scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. If anyone sitting down to watch this thinks those involved were unaware of just how ridiculous the whole enterprise is, more fool them.

This, of course, is not to imply that there is nothing here of serious intent. Case in point: Sandahl Bergman. Let no mere mortal question, this woman is 100% serious about KICKING ARSE. If I’ve got the chronology right, she actually made this film before Conan the Barbarian (though it seems to have later been sold on that association, with posters declaring ‘Sandahl Bergman tempted Conan and now she is ready to take on the world!’); prior to this her film work had been primarily as a dancer in All That Jazz and Xanadu (the latter of which featured another notable urban savage, Michael Beck of The Warriors). As such, it was She that really started her on the path to becoming one of the great big screen warrior women. Bergman is one of those rare actresses who truly warrants the description of statuesque, and her dancing background must surely have been a benefit to the fight sequences; check out the early cavern confrontation (embedded below), in which she takes on no less than six opponents single-handed. Sure, the overall treatment is cartoonish, but Bergman clearly means business, leaving even the more (in every sense) cocksure men in the audience in no doubt that she could wipe the floor with them… which is, in itself, rather a turn on. Factor in how scantily-clad she tends to be for the majority of the film, and we’re really onto a winner. Nor was this the last time director Nesher would stir the loins of nerds worldwide, given he went on to douse Drew Barrymore’s boobs with blood in Doppelgänger. (I’m sure other stuff happened in that film as well, but somehow those details slip my mind…)

So, the question remains – why isn’t She a widely acknowledged cult classic? Well, a decent DVD treatment wouldn’t hurt; the 2003 edition from Pegasus is in 4:3 with – if you’ll pardon my technical jargon – really crappy sound and picture quality (you can blame them for how murky these screenshots are), and no extras aside from a negligible image gallery. If Arrow or Shameless could get their hands on She and give it the treatment it deserves, I for one would be very happy. But on the other hand, perhaps the naffness of the sound and picture is part and parcel of the pleasures of a movie like this. It’s a low-rent production with poor photography, creaky sets, cheap-looking costumes; to experience such a film in glorious high definition and crystal clear surround sound might be to lose some of that bargain basement charm.

Either way – if you are as unfamiliar with the unique, exotic and insane delights of She as I was, I urge you to make that pilgrimage, track down that goddess and accept her, NOW! I can’t promise that it will be everyone’s cup of tea, but I should hope we can at least agree that there are very few films quite like it.

Warrior Week: Indonesian Epic 'The Warrior' (1981)

by Keri O’Shea

Movies released on the eponymous Indonesian label Rapi Films were nothing if not a pleasing fusion of East meets West; playing with recognisable genres, yet distinctly Indonesian in theme, you could always be sure of a mix between the familiar and the batshit insane. The Warrior is probably one of the best examples of that mix – coming as it does straight out of the golden age of Indonesian cinema, and what’s more, proving that the Far East could be ahead of the curve too: The Warrior made it to screens a year before Conan the Barbarian did, but anticipated some of its themes.

Without further ado, let me introduce you to our hero and the ‘warrior’ of the title. Meet Djaka Semboeng (or indeed Jaka Sembung – the spelling varies). The plot takes us back to some point in the nineteenth century, and to the Dutch occupation of Indonesia: Jaka, alongside many others, has been captured and put to work for his part in an uprising against the foreign invaders. Soul-crushing labour ensues – but you can’t keep a good man down, and Jaka leads yet another rebellion, Dutch muskets be damned. This time, he escapes, and the Dutch put a bounty on his head – Dead or Alive.

…And who should see one of these Wanted posters, but a local hard-nut, shaven-headed wizard? Kobar is the type of man who can breathe fire and wrestle cattle to death, and he fancies his chances at capturing Sembung. He offers to work for the Dutch – Sembung is bloodily victorious – but the Dutch have obviously taken to the idea of hiring black magicians to work for them, and so they engage a couple more (Indonesia obviously has its fair share). Cue resurrections, explosions, showers of boulders, imprecations to Allah, severed limbs, rudimentary transplants, bodily transformations, oh, and more explosions. Not to mention revenge, and lots of it!

What’s obvious from even the most cursory glance over all of that is that Rapi Films saw no problem with encompassing a fair few genres within one genre film. Here we have a blend of historical drama, fantasy and martial arts (though martial arts seem to be a prerequisite in anything from romance to horror in Far Eastern cinema, to be fair). As ‘busy’ a film as it is, though, The Warrior has more than enough about it to hold these elements together. It moves at a good pace, it’s action-packed, and it has a few minutes which are, to be fair, pretty shocking, considering where and when the film was made, let alone the no doubt limited budget. To balance out the copious use of fireworks and dry ice, The Warrior doesn’t flinch from women being violently beaten, eyes being gouged, and torture aplenty.

Of course, one of the film’s strengths for us Western audiences is the fun to be had from culture shock, and The Warrior has a lot to offer on that score. For a start, howsabout the depiction of Westerners themselves? It’s interesting to see how colonialists could be imagined by the local populations they planted flags amongst, and the Dutch here are our unequivocal bad guys. The only European with a heart is the daughter of the evil Commandant, name of Maria (though she’s played by an Indonesian woman, as there are only a handful of real live white folks in this movie). And, Maria’s sympathy for the native people seems to be a tad influenced by the fact that she has her beady eye on a nice bit of Jaka – which doesn’t do her much good in the end. The rest are ugly, hairy (with a few of the actors getting into role by dyeing their hair and beards an unconvincing blond) and of course arrogant. And their religion? “To hell with those Christians!” exclaims one of the (Muslim) rebels, a phrase which would go down like a cup of cold puke in many parts of Europe and America these days, as would the idea of a good Muslim boy as the hero. Whilst, interestingly, black magic seems to co-exist with Islam in The Warrior, it’s those pesky Dutch who employ it against Jaka, and when Jaka needs assistance, he gets his divine intervention from Allah. Invaders, infidels and conspirators, there’s not much good to say about Jaka’s persecutors here. Well, it makes a change for ‘us’ (perhaps unfairly assuming that the majority of BAH readers are American or European) to be the Other, eh?

As for Jaka himself, he’s intriguing, because he’s a folk hero on-screen played by a folk hero off-screen. Barry Prima, star of The Warrior, is a legendary figure in his native country; see all of those mad martial arts skillz? All genuine, after the star developed a fascination with Bruce Lee as a kid and, instead of just thinking ‘I wish I could do that’ like a lot of us might, he actually learned and learned really bloody well, too. His powerful presence was felt in a number of Indonesian genre films made throughout the 1980s (The Devil’s Sword being another stellar example), and part of the reason that the films are so successful is that, like so many genre film actors, he plays his roles completely straight. There’s camp in The Warrior, sure, but never deliberately so, and Prima always maintains a seriousness which means that you can laugh at a fair few things in the film, but not at him.

So where is Prima now? Well, according to the Mondo Macabro release which brought this remastered Warrior to modern audiences and also according to IMDb, he’s recently been back in front of the camera after a decades-long hiatus. He seems to have moved away from the freedom-fighting and into light comedy, but that’s by-the-by; it’s still good to hear that he’s still around and still making movies. And, hey, there’s only so much mass Dutch death you can perpetrate…

An epic film and a love-letter from Indonesia’s gloriously lurid film heyday, The Warrior has to be seen to be believed. On a sadder note, Indonesia’s political situation in recent years has meant a real downturn in their film industry, and current censorship laws would probably prohibit something as OTT as The Warrior being made today – see this film, then, and be grateful that Rapi Films did what they did when they could.

Warrior Week: The Days of High Adventure… 30 Years of Conan on Film


by Ben Bussey

Between the time when the ocean drank Atlantis and the rise of the sons of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of… a time when there was a conspicuous lack of movies featuring muscle-bound swordsmen doing battle with hideous monsters and black-hearted warlocks whilst quivering, nubile, near-enough butt naked women gripped feverishly at their calves. Then on May 14th 1982, Conan the Barbarian was unleashed on American cinemagoers, and things changed. It is in honour of the thirtieth anniversary of John Milius’s film that we declare this the first day of Warrior Week at Brutal As Hell, in which we will pay tribute to all manner of sword-swinging, limb-lopping, manly-smelling action adventure bloodfests. And what better way to kick things off than a look back at the big screen history of Conan?

We should get one thing out of the way first, however: I must confess to knowing very little of Conan beyond the films. To date I’ve read but a few of the 21 stories written by Robert E. Howard, and none of the later stories by Bjorn Nyborg and L. Sprague de Camp. I’ve heard murmurings that none of the films to date really get to the heart of the character as conceived by Howard, much as how few, if any, of the Bond movies reflected Ian Fleming’s creation until Casino Royale. This is a valid question, but it’s neither here nor there for my purposes. I suspect the filmmakers behind the Conan movies were ultimately less concerned with capturing the spirit of Howard than that of Frank Frazetta, whose justly famed paintings adorned the Conan paperback covers, luring many a casual bookshop browser with their grandiose blend of horror, musculature and sex appeal. These were very much the same visceral thrills offered by the film which kickstarted the sword and sorcery craze of the 80s, and launched the career of one of the most – how to put it diplomatically – singular Hollywood stars of the last three decades…

Conan the Barbarian (1982)

In a nutshell: when a Cimmerian village is devastated by an attack from an enigmatic horde, the young and newly orphaned Conan is sold into slavery. However, the arduous task he is assigned – pushing a massive heavy wheel for some untold purpose – proves better than a gym membership and a shit-ton of steroids, as after some years of it Conan grows into an absurdly big and beefy man (Arnold Schwarzenegger, of course). From here he’s sold or part-exchanged from the wheel-pushing trade to the gladiator industry, where he proves a dab hand at battering other big beefy men to death. Samurai sword school follows, which of course he also takes to like a duck to water. Before long Conan finds himself a free man, and there is only one thing on his mind; to hunt down the evil buggers who wiped out his people, and introduce them to the pointy end of his sword. And if he has to shag the odd witch, skewer a giant snake and spill a few gallons of blood in the process, then by Crom, that’s what he’ll do.

Impressions: I recall being less than taken with Milius’s film when I first saw it as a teenager. It all struck me as utterly pompous, overblown, overlong, and taking itself far too seriously whilst seeming to have no sense of its own inherent absurdity. Just goes to show, sometimes you don’t know shit when you’re young. To complain that both the movie and its leading man are impossible to take seriously or relate to on a real, human level is to completely miss the point. This is arch melodrama, played out on an epic scale, with suitably epic performers; nuance and subtlety is not the name of the game. And sure, it’s outwardly played straight for the most part, but there’s certainly no shortage of understated wit here. Schwarzenegger’s deadpan delivery came to be his trademark, and while he doesn’t quite have it down to a ‘T’ yet it’s still in evidence. And please don’t tell me we’re not supposed to bark with laughter when, whilst crucified and being pecked at by a vulture, he bites the fucking bird in the neck.

Of course, given that I have of late been musing on the problematic relationship between film and politics, I feel duty-bound to address the political overtones of Conan the Barbarian that have long troubled critics; specifically, there are those who condemn the film as an endorsement of fascism. Now, there is plenty here that runs contrary to my leftie pacifist leanings, but even I think it’s a bit of a stretch to call it a pro-fascist film. Many, I suspect, have haphazardly classed it as such immediately thanks to the opening quote from Nietzsche – that old, “that which does not kill us makes us stronger” chestnut – based on the common misconception that Nietzsche created Nazism. Yes, Nazis were influenced by Nietzsche, but so too were Anarchists, and in many respects Conan the Barbarian has stronger echoes of the latter philosophy, emphasising as it does that its liberated hero lives a free life without masters. In contrast with Conan’s free will and steely resolve, witness the disciples of Thulsa Doom (an agreeably Shakespearean James Earl Jones), portrayed as deluded fools who have given up all individuality under the thrall of hypocrites and charlatans, in what feels very much like a thinly veiled stab at guru-worshipping, soul-searching hippy culture. Conan’s stance would appear to be that a free life must be defended by force, and to lower your defences is the greatest folly; unsurprising, given that his father instructed him to trust only his sword.

But once again – being against violence in real life does not mean you have to abandon the fantasy of crushing your enemies, seeing them driven before you, hearing the lamentations of their women and all that jive. Conan’s the kind of man that all men daydream about being from time to time; a take-no-shit, take-no-prisoners type who does what he wants when he wants with whoever he wants, and dismembers anyone who tries to keep him from doing so. On top of which, I daresay all men from time to time wish they were built like Arnie, particularly as he is here with his pro-bodybuilding days not long behind him. As hard as it may be to believe, he actually slimmed down quite a bit for this film, to make him more physically suited to the athletic requirements of the role. While he doesn’t actually spend the duration of the film wearing nothing more than a loincloth (as he would in the sequel), his imposing physique is unavoidable, sending every male viewer into fits of inadequacy that invariably result in a few press-ups on the living room rug and a pledge to start a proper exercise regimen the next day. No, I don’t believe that’s just me…

However, if Arnie looking uber-buff was all it took for a movie to achieve instant cult status and inspire a slew of imitators, then we could just as easily be talking about Hercules in New York right now. To at least scratch the surface of the enduring appeal of Conan the Barbarian, we have to mention Ron Cobb’s beautiful sets, Basil Poledouris’s rousing score, and of course writer-director John Milius. His ear for a memorable turn of phrase, long since proven by such writing credits as Jaws and Apocalypse Now, really gives the film its teeth. From Mako’s gripping narration (note the opening speech delivered over a plain black screen, which surely inspired the prologue of the first Lord of the Rings), to Arnie’s unforgettable first line, to Sandahl Bergman’s militant declaration of love: “all the gods, they cannot sever us; if I were dead, and you still fighting for life, I’d come back from the darkness, back from the pit of Hell to fight at your side.” Sigh… and the most us boys usually get to hear is, “it’s not you, it’s me.” Yes, on that note, Sandahl Bergman (pictured above) is hypnotic as Valeria; not only does she brandish a blade and put boot to arse just as capably as Arnie, but she’s far more comfortable delivering that kind of colourful dialogue. No, she doesn’t take the spotlight as much as the Austrian Oak, but she’s every bit as pivotal to the film, and it’s a crying shame she didn’t go on to greater success as a leading lady. (Keep an eye out, though, as this is not the last time we’ll touch on Ms Bergman in Warrior Week...)

Significant addition to the Schwarzenegger repertoire – Arnie’s sex face. This is actually one of the few films in which the future Governator has sex scenes, apparently as he found them uncomfortable. One instance of the art clearly not reflecting the artist, I suppose…

 

Conan the Destroyer (1984)

In a nutshell: evil Queen Taramis (Sarah Douglas from Superman 2) asks Conan to go on a quest to steal some magic jewel thing. He does. She double crosses him. Fighting ensues.

Impressions: first of all, is it just me or does Arnie look strangely like Jason Mewes in the still above? “Noinch, noinch, noinch, schmokin’ weed, schmokin’ weed, crushin’ enemies, drivin’ ‘em before you, hearin’ the lamentations of the bitches…” Anyway, it seems my younger self wasn’t the only one concerned that Conan the Barbarian had taken itself a bit too seriously. Much as how the second Mission: Impossible movie was deliberately dumbed down after criticisms that first film was hard to follow, this sequel abandons the more sombre, operatic tone of Conan the Barbarian in favour of Saturday matinee theatrics. The result is a film that’s fairly good fun, but in no way, shape or form a worthy successor to Conan the Barbarian.

It’s perhaps inevitable that Conan the Destroyer (not the most appropriate title, given how mild the action is) feels closer to a 50s/60s B-movie than an 80s action-fest, seeing that Milius’s vacant director’s chair is filled by Richard Fleischer, the man behind such time-honoured classics as 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Fantastic Voyage, and one of the all-time greatest adventure movies, The Vikings. His approach here is considerably more workmanlike and surface-based than his predecessor. Where Milius aimed for a certain verisimilitude, eschewing the excessively fantastical, Fleischer seems determined to make things as over the top as possible. Perhaps most notably, whilst Conan the Barbarian sported a relatively slimmed down Arnie, Fleischer actually instructed Arnie to put weight on for his role here, making him more ridiculously pneumatic than ever. As may be reflected by the presence of Conan comic writers Roy Thomas and Gerry Conway on script duties (though their draft was rewritten, to their displeasure), Conan the Destroyer seems intended as a live-action comic book, rather than a timeless myth. Nothing wrong with that per se, but the real crux of the problem is that the producers caved to pressure for a more family friendly film. Net result: sex is completely out of the picture, violence is turned down several notches, and goofy humour is shoved in to fill the void.

Really, beyond the name of the character and the presence of Arnie and Mako, there’s very little here to relate the film to the original. Sure, there are a great many sequels in which this is the case, but it really stings here as there’s no avoiding the sense that the character and his universe have been severely short-changed. In the retrospective documentary on the first film’s DVD, Oliver Stone laments that at least a dozen Conan films should have been made, a new film every few years, James Bond style, paving the way to the grand, final story of Conan becoming a king. While references are made here to the big C’s prophesied future, as well as to his lost love Valeria (sorry Grace Jones and Olivia D’Abo, you don’t come close to filling Sandahl’s sandals), these moments feel very tacked-on; they’re feeble attempts to create a sense of continuity that simply isn’t there. Take also the use of music from the original’s temple orgy sequence in the climactic sacrifice scene, which makes no real sense given the absence of any connection between Thulsa Doom’s cult and Queen Taramis; it might be intended to give the impression of an organic link between the films, but it feels like laziness, using what was already available because it was easier to do so.

Still, if you don’t have too great a connection to the first film and enjoy a bit of silliness, Conan the Destroyer is still perfectly passable as a simple sword and sorcery adventure. There’s very little plot to follow, and plenty of cartoonish action along the way, with plenty of magic and monsters, all realised in a simplistic fashion. Apparently Andre the Giant fills one of the rubber suits in question.

Significant addition to the Schwarzenegger repertoire – Arnie’s drunk face. Conan the Destroyer has one of the all-time worst drunk scenes ever put to film: “The promise I was kingdommed!” “Lot on your knife!” Crom almighty… even Martin Lawrence on ecstasy in Bad Boys 2 wasn’t as embarrassingly awful as this.

 

Red Sonja (1985)

In a nutshell: not unlike young Conan, Sonja (Brigitte Nielson) is the sole survivor of a raid on her village. Not that she gets off too lightly, as she is gang-raped and left for dead. Visited by a goddess – or, if you prefer, suffering delusions in her near-death state – Sonja is imbued with the strength to fight back, and vows never to let another man touch her unless he can best her in combat. Off she goes to learn the way of the sword. Years later, her sister Varna (Janet Agren – okay, so I guess that means Sonja wasn’t the sole survivor) is a priestess in a temple that guards a magic talisman with the power to destroy the world. The power hungry Queen Gedren (Sandahl Bergman) – who, funnily enough, was responsible for the attack on Sonja’s village, and tried to have her own wicked way with Sonja – ambushes the temple, steals the talisman and takes it back to her kingdom. Mortally wounded, Varna heads off to seek Sonja’s help. Along the way she meets Kalidor (Arnie), a big muscular long-haired sword-swinging type (sound familiar…?) who locates Sonja for her. So begins Sonja’s journey to Gedren’s kingdom, where she will battle to both save the world and avenge herself against the bitch that wronged her.

Impressions: Okay, so officially this isn’t a Conan film. Despite featuring another Robert E. Howard creation and being made by the same team behind the existing Conan films, rights issues prevented the old Cimmerian appearing here as had originally been intended. However, much as the Godzilla of the 1998 US version is known by daikaiju purists as GINO (Godzilla In Name Only), we might very well refer to Kalidor as CIABN (Conan In All But Name)… okay, I’m not holding my breath for that to catch on…

Apparently Arnie calls this the worst film he ever made, but I have to disagree. While I’m sure this is partly down to sentimental attachment – I have fond memories of seeing it as a child – I do find Red Sonja much more satisfying than Conan the Destroyer, and certainly a more competent effort from returning director Richard Fleischer. I suppose as the narrative is that bit further removed from Conan, it makes it easier to forgive the film’s failings, of which there are of course many. Perhaps the biggest complaint for the contemporary fan is how little the title character resembles that of the comics. Far from the ruthless thief and mercenary of the comics, here she’s tough but sensitive, not to mention a bit prim and proper; witness how she lectures the obnoxious boy prince on minding his manners. Of course, it’s not just her persona but her look that has been tampered with. There can be little debate that the character’s enduring popularity is based in no small part on her sex appeal, and that’s rather lacking here, for not only is the iconic chain mail bikini ditched in favour of a rather more modest and less distinctive red cloak/leather onesie combo, but also the person filling that outfit is – well – Brigitte Nielson. Now, I don’t mean to seem shallow or insensitive, but while Brigitte Nielson may be many things… sexy just ain’t one of them. Or is that just me?

Of course, provided we can get our male chauvinist arses past that, there’s plenty to enjoy about her performance and the movie overall. Apparently our beloved Sandahl Bergman was the first choice for the lead, but she decided she wanted to mix things up and play the big bad Queen Gedren instead, which she does to amusingly pantomime effect. (As Gedren is a lesbian whose hatred of Sonja is rooted in having her advances spurned, some critics condemned the film as homophobic. I can see their point, but this is a very small, underemphasised plot detail; much as is the sexual nature of Sonja’s assault in the prologue.) Sure, it would have been a pleasure to see Bergman in the lead – especially if the chain mail bikini had been reinstated – but while Nielson may not be the foxier of the two actresses, she certainly holds her own as a warrior woman, leaving the viewer in no doubt that she’d kill you as soon as look at you. On top of which, having Arnie share scenes with someone whose accent is just as thickly European as his own makes for a refreshing change, and in a way boosts the sense of Norse myth about the whole enterprise. Not unlike Conan the Destroyer, it’s all annoyingly family-friendly and about as intellectually enriching as doing the Macarena in a bath of warm cheese, but there’s a certain perverse pleasure to be taken nonetheless. It’s just a bit sad that it wound up marking the last time the Hyborian Age would grace the big screen for just over twenty five years.

Significant addition to the Schwarzenegger repertoire – Arnie’s “someone’s sneaking up behind me” face.

Supplemental: Arnie’s horny face.

And on a side note: Brigitte Nielson’s utterly bugnuts insane face.

 

Conan the Barbarian (2011)

In a nutshell: once again, young Conan is the sole survivor when his Cimmerian village is attacked. However, this time his dad’s Ron Perlman, and the attack is not led by Thulsa Doom but Khalar Zym (Stephen Lang of Avatar), who’s looking for the pieces of a magic mask that will make him (drum roll please) all-powerful. Years later, the fully-grown Conan (Jason Momoa) roams free, loving and slaying his way across the land, but still searching for his revenge. He gets his chance when he crosses paths with vestal virgin-type Tamara (Rachel Nichols) whom Zym needs as a sacrifice to gain his (another drum roll) all-powerfulness. Before our tale is over, Conan will see to it that both Zym and Tamara meet the receiving end of his respective weapons…

Impressions: now here’s something that will be hard for me to confess… it’s a Marcus Nispel film that I actually quite like. Yes, I am currently flogging myself, much in the manner of Paul Bettany in the Da Vinci Code. The thing is, Nispel’s excessively glossy visual style and penchant for low humour, which so soured his Chainsaw and Friday the 13th remakes, are actually far more suited to this kind of rip-roaring adventure. Happily, all concerned saw better than to reign things in for PG-13; there’s a lot of full-on, head-smashing violence here, with as much emphasis on suffering and degradation as many a contemporary torture horror: witness our hero force-feeding a gaoler his own master key, then handing a knife to his prisoners so they can carve their way to freedom. To my mind, this film carries one of the more surprising 15 certificates the BBFC has given out of late.

I think a great deal of my affection for Conan 2011 comes from my complete lack of expectations beforehand; it’s not that the film is especially great, just that it could have been so much worse. As I said, I flat-out hated everything I’d seen from Nispel up to then, and as for the new Cimmerian Jason Momoa, at that point I only knew him from what little I’d seen of Stargate Atlantis, where he didn’t make much of an impression (I’m only just getting on the Game of Thrones train), but he was clearly the sensible choice given the competition for the role: the other two contenders were Kellan Lutz and Jared Padelecki, for Crom’s sake. However, Momoa proved to be something more than the best of a bad bunch; he was, I think, absolutely the best actor they could have cast right now. Not only does he score points for being ever-so big and buff, but he’s also smart enough not to emulate Arnie; if Superman Returns taught us anything, it’s that no matter how iconic their predecessor may have been, a new actor must be allowed to make a role their own. And boy, does Momoa make the role his own. It doesn’t quite reach Jack Sparrow-ish levels of theatricality, but this is one of the most unhinged, eccentric heroes I’ve seen in a major motion picture for quite some time, as the muscle-bound, gravel-throated actor proceeds to grunt, gurn, scowl and bark his way through every minute of his screentime, all the while clad in what looks suspiciously like a dress.

Momoa comes off like a kid in a candy shop in the role, and it’s an infectious spirit that goes some way to helping one overlook the film’s many little problems. For starters, it could have done without the half-hour prologue, and would have benefited from a more interesting story and better supporting performances: Nichols is just a bit bland, Lang and Perlman are doing it by the numbers, and Rose McGowan seems to be in a different film altogether (though not her would-be Red Sonja, of course). Still, when push comes to shove, Conan 2011 remains great fun. We don’t get enough fantasy films on this scale and budget that are unrepentantly family un-friendly, with plenty of gore and nudity to go along with the special effects. Alas, given how badly this film did at the box office, it may be a while before we see any more of this ilk; its underperformance seems likely to have scuppered any further Conan movies with Momoa, and from the looks of things may also have put the kibosh on the latest proposed Red Sonja reboot which might have seen Amber Heard don the chain mail bikini. To which I must say CROM-DAMMIT. (Still, there’s some comfort knowing Robert Rodriguez’s live-action Fire and Ice remake is also said to be on the horizon.)

Significant addition to the Schwarzenegger repertoire: Arnie’s “wait a minute, I’m not Arnie” face.

So there we have it. There’s been a cartoon, a live-action TV show and some video games, but otherwise this is it for Conan and the Hyborian Age on screen to date. And while it’s been fun, I truly hope these four films don’t wind up being Conan’s last, for while the original clearly remains the strongest so far, I get the feeling we’ve still yet to see a truly definitive cinematic outing for the great Cimmerian. There are without doubt many more Conan stories to tell, both written and unwritten; and we can but hope that, as the first film promised, those stories shall also be told…

Satanic Cinema Week: Retro Book Review – The Satanic Screen by Nikolas Shreck

Review by Keri O’Shea

Since cinema’s earliest inception, the presence of the Devil has been ubiquitous – whether Old Scratch appears as a monstrous entity or a cunning outsider, a gentleman magician or a horned miscreant, the silver screen has never been long without him. That is the central thesis of author Nikolas Schreck’s far-reaching (though intentionally not encyclopaedic) study of Satan on celluloid – and, as Schreck notes, considering the close relationship between the Devil and this particular offshoot of the arts, it’s strange that so little had been specifically written on this subject before Schreck did the job. Nikolas Schreck, himself a contentious and well-known figure in modern Satanism (located as he is on one side of a bitter schism from the Church of Satan founded by his wife’s late father, Anton LaVey), has crafted a very educational and interesting book here, travelling at a good pace through an abundance of material and examining along the way anything which intrigues him, be it grindhouse or arthouse. In fact, many of his detractors may just be kicking themselves that this book is as good as it is.

The book begins with the birth of cinema, making the point that the phantasmagoria shows which preceded film were themselves seen as a kind of magic by many; this link between sorcery and cinema was established further by the work of stage magician Georges Méliès, who brought a rendition of the Devil to the screen in a puff of smoke as early as 1896. As soon as the magic of cinema was in operation, black magic was right there with it. As the Silent Era progressed, with its numerous interpretations of the Faust legend, its homunculi and its magicians, Schreck observes that a difference sprang up between European (mainly German) and American cinema; whilst Europe featured Satanic deal makers, America stuck more to using Satan as a way of frightening people into behaving. Special mention is given to the still-remarkable Häxan (1921) and, divertingly, Schreck also picks up on the genuine occult significance of certain scenes in arguably the best known of the proto-horror movies, Nosferatu, thanks to the involvement of one Albin Grau, former Ordo Templi Orientis member and correspondent of Aleister Crowley.

Moving into the 1930s and 40s, Schreck identifies some notable movies in the Satanic tradition and, returning to Crowley, arguably the world’s most famous magician, notes the strange ways in which Crowley influenced film both within his own lifetime and beyond it. For instance, practitioner of the dark arts, Dr. Praetorius of The Bride of Frankenstein (1935), was played with aplomb by another English eccentric, Ernest Thesiger – who was, you’ve guessed it, an associate of Crowley’s. Although Crowley wasn’t a Satanist by any stretch of the imagination, ‘Great Beast’ moniker or otherwise, it’s interesting to see the ways in which a prominent occult scholar such as Crowley could have an important trickle-down effect into cinema – and it’s a point which only reiterates the connection between magic and the movies. Want a less heavy example of that connection? Look at the Satan – or Chernabog, a Slavic deity, by his proper name – who appears during the animated film Fantasia and the ‘Night on Bald Mountain’ sequence by a certain renowned corporation…remind you of anyone? Schreck posits that it was Bela Lugosi who chiefly influenced Chernabog’s appearance…

As the 1950s laboured under the weight of Communist paranoia – with its cinema reflecting this particular fear in its depictions of aliens, or worse, people who looked like us, talked like us, but were Other and mindless – Schreck highlights the beginnings of the career of occult filmmaker Kenneth Anger, a figure who strove to merge genuine ritual with cinema through his sparse, but nonetheless important filmography. The 1960s, with its widespread occult revival, provided far more fertile ground for on-screen devilry, and Schreck’s obvious admiration for Barbara Steele’s performance in Mario Bava’s Black Sunday holds up this film in particular as a shining example of the cinematic expression of this revival. No arguments from me there, or for the praise heaped upon Night of the Eagle and Masque of the Red Death. What Schreck is well-placed to offer here is a keen insider’s eye: the occult movement during the decade was unprecedented, and needs some unpicking to really get to the bottom of why and how it fed into the cinema of the period. Of course, no discussion of 60s occult cinema would be complete without mention of Rosemary’s Baby, a film which acted as a real game-changer, and one which is still influential in the following century.

Rosemary’s legacy stretched on into the 1970s, but now alongside a conservative Christian subtext, most notably within films such as The Exorcist (which gets a deserved beating here) and The Omen. Schreck’s opinions on post-1960s cinema reflect the fact that he sees an unmistakeable dumbing-down in culture in recent years, so the enthusiasm and anecdotal asides which punctuated the earlier chapters of the book become fewer and further between; you can almost hear a sigh of disappointment at the beginning of the final three chapters, which cover the 70s, 80s and 90s. His castigation of Messrs. Lucas and Spielberg, who of course first ventured into filmmaking during this time, for their “safe, unchallenging fantasies of Manichean simplicity” may chafe with film fans who harbour nostalgic impulses towards films such as Star Wars, but his assertion that they promote “a dreary twelve-year-old boy’s vision of the universe where machines are neat, girls are icky, and everything moves really fast and explodes” is certainly a sharp piece of bravura. It’s not all (a lack of) doom and gloom, though. Before signing off, Schreck praises Kenneth Anger’s Lucifer Rising, Hellraiser (“one of the first significant fictional occult worlds since H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos”) and The Ninth Gate, amongst a small number of others, as examples of Satanic filmmaking of significance, even in decades he regards as otherwise rather dry.

It covers a wealth of material spanning approximately one hundred years, but The Satanic Screen is heavily imbued with the decidedness and keenness of a firm film fan. Although it is more studied than conversational in tone, there’s plenty of humour throughout, and that Schreck takes pleasure in playing with language is apparent, as he coins terms and expressions such as ‘Hollywooden’, ‘first cloven steps’, ‘Mephistomania’, ‘Poe-pourri’ and, Heaven forfend, ‘loquacious labia’. As a guide to Sinister cinema, it has to be said – this book really is second to none.

However, agreeing or disagreeing with Schreck’s spin on the films he covers is one thing. Where his enthusiasm wanes, you may differ, but you can be sure that he will honestly describe his issues with the films in question, and you can then take his points on board, or not, as you decide. Less honest is how he deals with his schism with the Church of Satan, a subject which crops up in particular during his discussion of Rosemary’s Baby. Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey always asserted that he appeared in a cameo role as the Devil in this film, and Schreck spends some time scathingly asserting the opposite. That Schreck had personal dealings with LaVey, to say the least, is not mentioned at all during this diatribe – making it the elephant in the room here, because most people aware of Schreck’s name will know of his erstwhile involvement with the Church of Satan, and although his silence on this score doesn’t make his point regarding Rosemary’s Baby untrue (I personally doubt that LaVey did appear in Rosemary’s Baby, for what’s it’s worth), it does makes him appear disingenuous. Showing his hand would have done him no harm here. In fact, registering that personal animosity more openly – without turning the book into a saga, of course – would have helped to explain why Schreck sneers at LaVey for certain things (such as having had a distinctly middle-class following, for example, or for treating Satanism as ‘showbiz’) which he doesn’t criticise at all when it’s equally true of others whom he discusses in positive terms; Méliès, for instance, is described as using ‘novelty and razzle dazzle’, something which Schreck seemingly admires in him, but detests in his late unfather-in-law. These instances come across as pockets of unreason, in an otherwise carefully-reasoned piece of work.

This is one weak link in an otherwise engaging, well-argued and well-structured book, I must stress, and I absolutely still recommend The Satanic Screen. Those interested in magic will find numerous nods to the true nature of the left hand path; those whose interest is purely that of film buff will find a meticulously-researched compendium of films well-known and lesser-known – though it is too witty to be a pure reference guide. If nothing else, though, your wish list will double in size after reading, so this is a book well worth seeking out.

Satanic Cinema Week: 'Data Incomplete – Human Blood Required'! Revisiting Evilspeak (1981)

by Keri O’Shea

Nothing, absolutely nothing, will make you want to see a film more than being told you can’t. This is a maxim which holds true now (some filmmakers seem to actively court the type of controversy which will get their film banned) and, back in the pre-DVD days, before you could spend five minutes browsing Amazon for all your grisly and perverse needs, it was the driving force behind the appeal of a hell of a lot of films. You only have to think about the Video Nasties legislation – of which this particular film fell foul – to realise that many of the films on the list would have sunk without trace had people not wanted to track them down to see what all the fuss was about. Rather later than the Video Nasties furore, though, a teenage girl growing up in a small town in the back of beyond got told about a friend of a friend who had a copy of a horror video that she needed to see…a film where a kid summons the Devil…

That film was Evilspeak, and I revisited it for the first time since around 1993 just the other day. What a difference nearly twenty years makes (and have I really been alive that long?) Stripped of the veneer of being a banned ’18’ film passed onto me by a suitably dodgy individual, it was a lot easier to see what was wrong with Evilspeak – namely, not very much happens for the bulk of the film, and the intriguing promise of the Esteban story doesn’t get developed as fully as I would like. But you know what? I still really enjoyed watching it again. Evilspeak is a quirky little movie with some refreshing ideas, most notably the notion of splicing up-to-date technology with ancient magic.

So many of these movies take fantastic set-ups to do one thing, though: let the little guy get revenge on the evil jock bastards who have made his life a living hell. Whatever supernatural being permits this, the fact that it keeps on cropping up as a theme is a seriously worrying indictment of the American school system: America, rein in your sports goons! Anyway, Stanley Coopersmith, played by Gentle Ben child actor Clint Howard, is one of the little guys – doing his utmost to succeed in the military academy he attends, and absolutely failing. Teachers and students alike seem to have a hard time with him, while Coopersmith has a hard time doing just about anything – arriving on time, not falling over, not fucking up on the sports field…the only thing he seems to enjoy is using his uber-clunky and old school (to us) home computer. So, he doesn’t make life very easy for himself, but then it’s ever likely he would have had a tough time anyway. Military Academies are not known for their tolerance, after all, and fallibility is not a desired characteristic. Put on cellar cleaning detail (!) for a transgression one day, Coopersmith finds a stash of occult paraphernalia, including a grimoire, which had belonged to the daemonic Esteban we see getting up to nefarious deeds at the start of the film, in a period sequence which more than holds its own with other period representations of cults on-screen. Hmm…so could the Devil be the answer to Coopersmith’s woes? Coopersmith begins inputting what he reads in the grimoire into his computer – where it seemingly takes on a life if its own. Dark forces are at work, and Coopersmith, pledging himself to Satan, is now their agent…

Considering that, now the internet is completely ubiquitous and held up by some as proof that society is going to hell in a handbasket, it is interesting to see this idea of technology = evil being used so long before computers were absolutely everywhere. In the early eighties, computers were only just becoming a familiar sight; the rise of the computer nerd was a relatively new thing, too. Coopersmith may have had a sizeable cohort had he existed in a later decade, but back at the very start of the eighties, things were a bit more clandestine, and the whole set-up must’ve seemed like a sort of necromancy to the uninitiated. It’s just him, his computer – and that mysterious book. The computer is literally transformed into a conduit of evil, complete with brilliantly eighties graphics when the machine starts giving the orders, such as compelling marauding pigs to attack the pesky librarian who tries to interfere in proceedings by trying to prize the precious stones from the grimoire’s cover, for example…

Yes, I did say ‘pigs’. Leaving aside the certainty held during this decade that all a woman had to do to be transformed into a ravishing beauty was to unpin her hair and take her glasses off, if she was wearing any, one of the things Evilspeak is chiefly remembered for is its pig attack scene. Now, I’ll agree: it’s a bloody strange sequence – but a terrible one? I don’t think so. As far as symbolic critters go, you can do worse than pigs. Goats are usually held to represent Satan thanks to their ‘carnal’ natures, but are they really more carnal than pigs? Nope, plus pigs are more intelligent and a fuck of a lot nastier – just ask Miss Friedemeyer, who meets a grisly end (just after a steamy shower, of course), many years before this particular species of animal marauded through the horror genre in a similarly nasty scene in Hannibal, twenty years later. For me, this is another facet of the film where director Eric Weston takes a chance on something rather innovative and manages it just fine. Also, goats wouldn’t have worked, cloven hooves or not…

As for the pay-off at the end of this film, where Coopersmith’s Satanic pretensions pay off, you’ve just got to love it. As I suggested, they make you wait…and wait…for any sort of conclusion, but for the last ten or fifteen minutes of Evilspeak you get a head-rolling, levitating, blood-splattering catharsis sequence which is a lot of fun to watch (and, thanks to the believability of the jock characters, especially after their final outrage against their classmate, you can really relax into hating them enough to enjoy their eventual comeuppance). Coopersmith does deserve his moment of revenge, and if 80% of the film’s budget seems to have been ploughed into one sequence, then so be it – you get your money’s worth. This film boasts one of the most over the top conclusions ever committed to celluloid.

Flawed, yes indeed, but Evilspeak (which was only passed uncut in the UK as recently as 2004) deserves the modest cult following it enjoys, for its imagination and moments of real excess, propped up as they are by decent performances, especially from Howard, who does deliver some real pathos in-between the more zany scenes. As an entrant in the Satansploitation genre, it checks a lot of boxes, and it adds one of its own; we have probably all suspected, at one time or another, that our damn computers are sentient, and Evilspeak is an early expression of that possibility. And, all before the worst CGI outrages found their way into film, as well!

Satanic Cinema Week: Keri's Top 10 On-Screen Devils

As tomorrow is Walpurgisnacht, we at Brutal As Hell decided this would be as good a time as any to celebrate Satan on screen. Kicking things off, here’s an appropriately devilish entry from Keri O’Shea…

The Devil’s relationship with cinema is a lengthy one. As the horrors of Hell have always found their way into art and literature, so the complex figure of Satan has always been at home on the silver screen – a medium which has long enjoyed playing with many of the ideas we associate with Old Scratch. From playful outrage to catastrophe, from the desire for power to the power of desire, Satan’s been a key player all along, and as such, we’ve seen him (or maybe even her) in lots of different guises down through the years. Well, the cloven feet aren’t always appropriate to the event, are they?

In putting together my list of my ten favourite representations of the Devil (and closely-related figures) on screen, I’ve tried to gather together examples which are as different from each other as they are memorable to me: yes, Satan may often be seen as an impresario with a good suit, but we don’t need or want just a cluster of good suits any more than we want a roomful of people with horns. I’ve also put together a fairly eclectic list; when I researched this article, and looked at what other people had made of the topic, I saw the same old faces and films, again and again, Robert de Niro, Al Pacino, and so on, and so on. I hope at least a few of my devils and unholy denizens are new and interesting, without ignoring too many characters who deserve their notoriety. So, without further ado…

10: Viggo Mortensen in The Prophecy (1995)

Biblical beings returning to Earth to effect changes in their own sphere: this has been the basis of a quite a few films through the years, but The Prophecy is an artistic take on this theme with a great cast, including Viggo Mortensen as Lucifer himself. Now, for my purposes here I’ll be conveniently ignoring the finer points of the plot to repeat – Viggo Mortensen. As Lucifer. As a very attractive Lucifer, it’s fair to say, especially when we remember that Satan has always been associated with the pleasures of the flesh. The Prophecy has a great many strengths, to be sure, but bringing a LILF to our screen is something I personally treasure it for.

9: Enrique Rocha in Satánico Pandemonium (1975)

Enrique Rocha’s deliciously camp turn as a Devil in red polyester definitely deserves a mention. His is a performance played with relish and a sense of fun, as he assaults the pious sister Maria at every turn, teasing her and tempting her to relinquish her high morals. A number of entertaining scenes are included to this purpose, such as Lucifer emerging naked from the river where Maria has gone to sit and enjoy the simple pleasures of God’s green earth, and the impish way Lucifer enjoys his (symbolically-loaded) apple, again, to Maria’s horror. People seem to really enjoy playing the Devil, and Enrique Rocha is absolutely one of them.

8: Peter Cook in Bedazzled (1967)

The Devil needn’t arrive intoning serious Biblical lore; in fact, one of the best on-screen Devils usually arrives with a cheery ‘Allo, Stanley!’ before wreaking sly and very funny, if plaintive, chaos on his unassuming charge. The Devil – or, as he walks amongst us by many different names, one of which is George Spiggott – saves the down-and-out Stanley (Dudley Moore) from the suicide he’s decided is the best way out of his miserable, unfulfilling life. Stanley decides to make a go of it instead, with George’s ‘help’: George buys his soul, and gives him seven wishes as compensation. However, every time Stanley uses a wish, George exploits some loophole in what he’s asked for to make poor Stanley all the more miserable. The verbal sparring between these two is a pleasure to watch, and Peter Cook brings one of the most likeable rogues ever to the screen here, all against the lost but ever-charming backdrop of Sixties London.

7: ‘Cernunnos’ [uncredited] in Alucarda (1975)

Before anyone comments to say I’m getting my mythology mixed up, consider the plot of the batshit-insane Mexican nunsploitation flick Alucarda: novice nun with a pathological attraction to dark forces signs a blood pact with a strange hunchbacked gypsy she and friend Justine meet in the woods. As you do. The coven they join with might be trying to raise Cernunnos, the horned god of the forest, but Alucarda keeps calling out to Judeo-Christian entities like Belial, so it’s not me that’s mixing up my mythology per se, it’s writer Juan López Moctezuma, and we wouldn’t have it any other way, now would we? The statuesque horned being which materialises to welcome the new girls and to oversee a nice celebratory orgy obviously has enough in common with depictions of the Devil to be allowed his place here, I reckon, especially as pagan gods have in the past been demonized by jittery religious folk.

6: Siobhan McKenna in Daughter of Darkness (1947)

A little-known film filled with ambiguity and undercurrents of repressed sexuality, Daughter of Darkness introduces us to the at-first gentle and persecuted Emmy, a young woman inexplicably hated for her supposed malign influence on the town’s menfolk by the women of the small Irish village where she lives. Emmy protests her innocence, and seems genuinely afraid of the situation unfolding around her, but the women have their way: the orphan girl is soon sent into service in England, far away from them, and their men. But is she truly as bewildered and innocent as she protests? Before long, we see a subtle darkness to her character. She does seem to have a chaotic effect on the males of our species after all, and we see – though never fully understand, to the film’s credit – the damage she does in her new place of residence. Emmy’s position as a temptation, an unknown force and a threat to order makes her an effective devil’s advocate if not a manifestation of Satan, and Daughter of Darkness manages to explore these themes with a subtlety which is years ahead of its time. The Devil could, indeed, be a woman…

5: Chernabog in Fantasia (1940)

The Disney Corporation, getting a mention on a site like Brutal as Hell? Really? Well, it turns out that many horror fans have a soft spot for their early animated fairy stories – which are themselves full of the sorts of details we’d probably spare overprotected children nowadays – and then of course, the ‘Night on Bald Mountain’ sequence in Fantasia has that fantastic, though brief, appearance from the Slavic ‘dark god’ Chernabog – another example of Old Nick getting mixed up with European pagan deities, but, with his majestic, winged and horned appearance, his skills as a necromancer and having his fun curtailed by church bells, he’s obviously has a great deal in common with Satan. As a child, incidentally, I was bitterly disappointed when he and his cohorts were vanquished by the insipid strains of Ave Maria…

4: Emil Jannings in Faust (1926)

We travel back further still for our next two on-screen devils, first with Murnau’s stand-out exploration of the enduring myth of souls-for-sale in Faust. If ever a film embodied the phrase, ‘the road to Hell is paved with good intentions’ then it is this one, because Faust the alchemist wants to save his village from a deadly pestilence by selling his soul. He wants to help people. Mephisto (Jannings), whose fault the plague is anyway, manipulates Faust, providing him with youth and lust, but always nurturing human misery along the way. It’s a technically-staggering early film with a versatile and conniving antagonist.  

3: Benjamin Christensen in Häxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922)

A staggering ninety years old this year, Häxan is still a breathtaking piece of film. Possibly in part thanks to how early it was made, it plays with structure and format in innovative ways which many filmmakers would avoid even now, but when Christensen made this film, there was very little to tell him how he should do it. Nothing had been set in stone at this stage. He felt free to go for a series of vignettes on the topic of sorcery, spanning from the 14th Century to the society Christensen knew, ostensibly forming a documentary on witchcraft, but with fantastical sequences forming part of it. Could he resist imagining witches’ sabbats on-screen, if this was his subject matter? No, absolutely not, and not only that, but Christensen himself features as the Djævlen (Devil) in his film, having the usual great time doing so. The Devil here is a traditionalist – horned, cloven-hooved, fleshly and insurrectionist.

2: Tihomir Stanic in The Enemy (2011) 

The mysterious man here is certainly not a traditional devil in the sense of how he appears, but in how he behaves – dividing friends, exploiting weaknesses – his character is an interesting interpretation of the Devil. This comes through a stunning, low-key performance from Stanic as Dana, a man whom a group of soldiers find walled into a derelict factory as they perform a sweep of the nearby area at the end of the Bosnian War. They take him back to base, give him shelter but – there is something indefinable and threatening about him. When he talks to the men alone, he sends them into panic, or rage, or self-doubt. He is clever, and elusive, but gradually the soldiers ascertain who he is, but not yet what he can do or what he wants with them. A genuinely novel approach to some age-old themes, The Enemy (or Neprijatelj, to give it its Serbian title) deserves to be seen by far more people than have so far had the chance.

1: Eddie Powell in The Devil Rides Out (1968)

He’s officially uncredited for the part of The Goat of Mendes, otherwise known as Baphomet, in this lurid, clever adaptation of Dennis Wheatley’s novel, but stuntman Eddie Powell is almost certainly the man behind the goat, so to speak, in one of the strongest of the pop-occult movies of the 60s. One of its many strengths (not least the performance of Charles Gray as Mocata, who summoned our horned f(r)iend in the first place) is that it’s a film with some research behind it. The creature being played by Powell – allowing for the fact that the make-up used looks rather dated – is indeed Baphomet, as imagined by famed 19th Century occultist and magician Eliphas Lévi, a man whose influence on the occult revivals which came after his lifetime is not to be underestimated. Baphomet has a long pedigree, going right back to the fall of the Knights Templar in the 1300s. It also has a complex history, embodying anything from early Christian fear of Islam (‘Baphomet’ as a name is thought to stem from the word ‘Mahomet’, an early word for Muhammed) to those ever-balanced Christian perceptions of paganism, taking on various characteristics along the way. Essentially, Baphomet is an icon to fear and misunderstanding which has taken on a life and image of its own, and the team behind The Devil Rides Out were aware of this, using Lévi’s vision of the Goat of Mendes to powerful effect in an excellent film.

 

Festival Report: Brussels International Fantastic Film Festival 2012

Festival Report by Nia Edwards-Behi

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the Brussels International Fantastic Film Festival. The genre giant, as ever, provides a packed schedule of great films, notable guests and plenty of atmosphere. A cornerstone of genre festivals, it’s testament to the festival team that a crowd of die-hard fans can mingle with Joe Public, that young and old have equal opportunity to be entertained, and that all the while a dedication to the genre of fantastic films is evident from those behind the scenes.

I saw a whole bunch of films while I attended the first few days of the festival, but I’d like to start by mentioning the Collectifff project: a collection of short films put together by Belgian directors to celebrate BIFFF’s birthday. They range from the funny (Bowling Killers by Sebastien Petit) to the action-packed (Collector by Sebastien Briedis) to the sexy (Belgian Psycho by Katia Olivier). My favourite of the lot was without a doubt the endearing Happy Birthday Mr. Zombie by David Leclercq, an imaginative little film well worth seeking out. Special mention has to go to Slutterball, by Jérôme Vandewattyne, which really should have thoroughly offended my sensibilities, and yet manages to be a film so demented that it’s an undeniably enjoyable mess. Demonstrated throughout all the Collectifff films was a love for the festival, evidenced indeed by many of films’ use of festival organisers in their casts, or the knowing references made to festival conventions and habits. The Collectifff project was truly and impressive and wonderful way to celebrate BIFFF’s big birthday.

There were two other short films I watched in my time in Brussels, both directed by notable genre favourites: Terry Gilliam’s The Wholly Family and Night Fishing by Park Chan-wook and his brother Park Chan-kyong. Gilliam’s film is adequate at best, demonstrating some painfully wooden acting while offering little new in its whimsy. One or two moments and entertainingly morbid, but ultimately the film is almost instantly forgettable. Night Fishing fares somewhat better, but mostly as an interesting snapshot of a particular culture’s mourning traditions than as a horror film. The most blatantly horrific sequence, which occurs at the start of the film, features Park Chan-wook’s particular brand of dark humour, but this is quickly lost as the rest of the film is taken up with a shamanistic funeral. The film is notable for being shot entirely on an iPhone 4, but, while this is impressive, in the hands of a filmmaker of such calibre it’s no wonder it turned out well.

The range of feature films on offer this year truly reflected BIFFF’s status as a ‘fantastic’ film festival – that is, its rubric is to showcase not only horror films, but fantasy, science-fiction, action and thrillers are all included.

My three favourite films from the festival are vastly different. A devastating, harrowing and utterly compelling film, Kotoko is the latest from Testuo director Shinya Tsukamoto. The legendarily vocal BIFFF audience appeared to detest the film, but it was by far the festival stand out for me. It’s an incredibly slow moving film, but it never felt boring to me. Japanese singer Cocco takes the lead role of a woman who suffers a mental breakdown when her perceptual disorders make raising her child alone unbearable. It’s hard to do it justice, and it’s a film that’s going to take a few more viewings to fully appreciate, but it feels like a perfect, quiet companion piece to Tetsuo, in many respects, and even though it feels overwhelmingly serious, it has its moments of dark humour, like its predecessor. As breath-takingly difficult the film was, I cannot wait to see it again.

Father’s Day is the latest offering from Troma, and boy, does it deliver. Impressively well-made and fantastically irreverent, the film is genuinely funny whilst being incredibly inappropriate. What starts off as a serial killer movie turns into something else entirely, without seeming out of place. The film boasts some strong performances and a wicked soundtrack, and benefits from a truly funny framing device of being a TV show, complete with mid-film ad-break. I absolutely cannot wait to see this film again with a crowd.

Alex de la Iglesia’s new film As Luck Would Have It isn’t remotely a genre piece, but nevertheless, is worth a mention for being absolutely lovely, and one of my favourites from the festival. There’s a sense of whimsy to the film that maybe lends it a degree of fantasy, in the same way that a film like After Hours can be considered as such. The central performance from Jose Mota as Roberto, an out-of-luck advertising executive who tries to make the most out of an unfortunate accident, is gloriously inane and touching, providing a vital heart at the centre of the film.

Two incredibly silly films of varying levels of depth are Iron Sky and Zombie Ass. Both were films I highly anticipated and while one only just met my expectations, the other thoroughly surpassed them. Zombie Ass is as it sounds. It’s the latest Japanese splatter fest and while I found it thoroughly entertaining and, yes, even funny, it’s hardly a good film. It’s clear that Iguchi & co. are truly scraping the barrel (so to speak), and it shows most clearly through the use of a single-location (methinks their budgets are rapidly decreasing) and the almost entirely CGI effects. While Machine Girl and the like were glorious examples of fantastic practical effects, the over-abundance of CGI blood and fluids in these films are now verging on the… well, sad. Iron Sky, on the other hand was significantly cleverer than I expected, and even quite sweet. It’s a film about moon Nazis, and is massively entertaining (and in thoroughly bad taste, at times), but yet, it feels like a film that has something to say. Some great performances really round off what is a truly enjoyable film.

Beast is a completely different, er, beast: all slow and ambiguous and pretentious…so, naturally, I liked it. Reminiscent of a film like Trouble Every Day, I wasn’t ever sure if I was bored, while at the same time captivated. It’s a beautiful film to look at, and it’s central theme of sexual obsession and consumption is fascinating. It’s lead performances are powerful, particularly that of Nicolas Bro, who is, at times, truly repulsive, and yet, never unsympathetic.

The Road is something of an uneven film, but it both managed to scare and move me. Director Yam Laranas constructs and intricate tale, told in three parts, which is part-ghost story, part-police procedural, part-psychological thriller. I particularly enjoyed an early sequence in which three young teenagers are scared silly, and while normally I’d find screaming teens irritating, their behaviour made me think that, actually, that’s probably how I’d react in their situation too. The film’s twist isn’t original, but it unfolds in an entertaining and compelling way.

Two films which probably shouldn’t have been as enjoyable as they were are British kill-a-bunch-of-teenagers film Truth or Dare and the German haunted-room film 205: Room of Fear. Both stick to well-worn formulas, but both have enough charm of their own to remain worth watching. Truth or Dare is full of unlikeable bastard characters, but it also has a nice twist on the ending you might expect which I particularly admired. 205: Room of Fear is refreshingly character driven, and although massively derivative, it has some decent set-pieces to go with compelling if not especially interesting characters.

Sennentuntschi: Curse of the Alps is a film that indulges in being far too long, not least of all through its wholly unnecessary present-day framing device around a film set in the 70s. Otherwise, it’s entertaining enough, particularly as the story it tells is relatively unfamiliar. Roxane Mesquida is particularly fabulous, as ever, even if the film is a little heavy on the men-abusing-women thing.

The Butterfly Room is an entertainingly tongue-in-cheek melodrama, feeling like something of a throwback to those women’s pictures which had a hint of horror to them. The film is most interesting for its cast, though: legendary icon Barbara Steele in the mental lead role, and supporting turns and cameos from the likes of Heather Langenkamp, Erica Leerhsen, Camille Keaton, Adrienne King and P. J. Soles.

Elevator is a film that’s astonishingly static. Yes, things happen, but those things don’t take us anywhere, and give a clear sense of where they’re starting from. An inventive concept, in some ways (group of people stuck in an elevator and someone’s got a bomb!), but any attempts at topicality are rendered somewhat limp due to its damp squib of an ending. Conceptually similar to Panic Button – morally dubious characters learn a lesson in a confined space – the British film does a much better job at making a point.

Another film which reminded me of better work was Game of Werewolves. In fairness to the film, perhaps it’s my lack of a sense of humour that’s the problem here – everyone else I spoke to adored this film, but I can genuinely say it didn’t make me laugh once. It had other things going for it, that is, a strong cast and some good transformation effects, but overall the film bored me to pieces, and reminded me a lot of Faye Jackson’s Strigoi, a film I enjoyed a lot more.

Takashi Shimizu’s second foray into 3D, Tormented, is a good story hidden in a mess of images, unfortunately, and my over-riding impression of the film is that the giant bunny character was really cute – which I suspect was not the intention of the film.

Zombie 108 is the first zombie film to come from Taiwan…and it shows. The film rapidly undoes the good impression of its excellent opening-titles with seizure-inducing editing and over-whelming clichés. It’s those clichés that make Zombie 108 at least watchable, as it is entertaining in a so-bad-it’s-funny sort of way. Zombie 108 feels like a project that has had money thrown at it, with little consideration of nurturing any emergent talent first. The troublingly sexist and mildly racist undertones of the film would only be more worrisome were the film remotely powerful.

Invasion of Alien Bikini was perhaps the most misleading film I saw. Both its title and poster imply a fun, Sushi Typhoon-esque romp, but instead, the film is a 74-minute mess that feels like losing around 3 years of your life. The film spends about 20 minutes on a scene of two characters playing Jenga, before descending into a depiction of forced alien sex, the brutal beating of the alien-woman, and then some bizzaro political subplot…I think? I genuinely am not sure.

Finally, as for Julia X? The less said the better. Just…no. No. NO.

So, after a glut of films in an incredibly sort space of time, I thoroughly need a recovery period of lying very still in a very dark and quiet room. Same again next year? Most definitely. Merci, BIFFF.