Review: Prometheus

Review by Stephanie Scaife

Mild spoilers ahead.

I was fairly reluctant to get on board with Prometheus when I first read that Ridley Scott was returning to the world of Alien, because – let’s face it – the franchise had long run out of steam and Scott hasn’t made a decent film since, well, Blade Runner, and that was 30 years ago (I guess Thelma & Louise and Gladiator were okay, but still…) Also, what would it be about? A prequel? A sequel? Then news of the casting came to light, and the trailers and viral marketing campaign were all very appealing, meaning that very quickly I became very excited. Alien after all, is in my top ten of all time and for a moment there was a glimmer of hope that Scott could actually be on to something amazing. However, when I finally sat down to watch Prometheus it wasn’t what I had been expecting at all. It wasn’t necessarily bad per se, but it really didn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

Noomi Rapace stars as Elizabeth Shaw, an archaeologist with inexplicable religious faith who, along with her boyfriend Holloway (Logan Marshall-Smith), discovers a series of ancient cave paintings depicting the same constellation of stars. They interpret this as being a key to discovering the origins of life on earth, which if the opening scene is anything to go by started when some muscley bald dude drank some wriggling black goop and fell off a cliff into some water… Darwin who, eh? This is clearly much more feasible to Shaw and indeed the corporation willing to spend a trillion dollars on a space programme to find the constellation, some two years away from earth.

The crew of Prometheus slumber whilst android David (Michael Fassbender) maintains the ship. In what is perhaps the best scene of the film we see David as he monitors the crew, learns foreign languages, dyes his hair (not sure why an android would need to do this…) and watches his favourite film, Lawrence of Arabia whilst mimicking and basing his mannerisms on Peter O’Toole. Fassbender and his portrayal of David is perhaps solely responsible for about 90% of what is good about Prometheus. With echoes of Scott’s Blade Runner, David is very much like a replicant and he provides a reminder to the crew and the audience that we are human but he is not, and would it be possible for an android to be a sentient being with a soul and free will. David also provides increasing amounts of comic relief in an otherwise dour film; he is somewhat like a child in that his observations are often truthful but his delivery of them is not always tactful or welcome. In one pivotal scene David asks Holloway why humans had created androids such as himself, to which Holloway replies, “we made you because we could.” David responds with “imagine how disappointing it would be for you to hear the same thing from your creator.” Considering their entire mission hinges on the pursuit to find the origins of human life, to both Holloway and Shaw there has to be a more valid answer than that. But what David is saying is essentially the crux of the plot: where did we come from and why? But of course the truth of the matter is never going to be one that agrees with having faith in a creator or divine being; it will only ever serve to be a disappointment.

Part of the problem with the film is that there never really is any insight into why these so-called engineers may have created human life on earth or even if it was entirely intentional. Shaw’s unwavering faith is also irksome, especially as she’s supposed to be a credible scientist. Or even worse, was her quest to find the root of human existence motivated by her own inability to conceive and create life? You know, because all women desperately want to spawn and become slightly hysterical when they can’t.

This isn’t to say that there aren’t good things about Prometheus; it is a highly watchable but flawed spectacle. Visually it’s fantastic, and with a lesser cast the clunky dialogue would have completely overwhelmed the entire picture but they all do their best, even those there to provide little more than a body count. There are also a few great squishy slimy moments that did genuinely make my skin crawl, even if it isn’t as outright scary as Alien. Ultimately the success of Alien was that it was claustrophobic and it very much centred on the here and now, whereas Prometheus gets bogged down by asking too many big questions that ultimately never really get answered due to the lack of narrative focus and a muddled script.

Perhaps without such high expectations and the shadow of one of the best sci-fi horror films ever made looming over it Prometheus would have been a more enjoyable experience for me, but after a first viewing I was left disappointed. Even for a piece of genre filmmaking where it is often easy to let things go unexplained there were just too many monstrously gigantic plot holes and inexplicable character motivations to satisfy me. Undoubtedly it’s still one of the best big budget studio pictures of the summer, it’s just not what I was expecting or particularly wanted. Who knows, maybe it will improve over time with multiple viewings; after all, Blade Runner didn’t do so well commercially and critically upon release, and we all love that now…

Prometheus is currently on general release in the UK and arrives in US cinemas on 8 June.

Advance Review: Panic Button

Panic Button (2011)
Directed by: Chris Crow
Starring: Scarlett Alice Johnson, Jack Gordon, Michael Jibson, Elen Rhys
Review by: Nia Edwards-Behi

The horror genre has always been an effective arena for exploring the topical, and Panic Button is a film that does exactly that. Taking the tricky topic of social networking as its inspiration, this impressive low-budget thriller explores the more sinister possibilities of living online. Four strangers win a competition on social networking site All2Gethr that sees them boarding a swanky private jet taking them for a once in a lifetime trip to New York City. As they settle down to the in-flight entertainment – a game hosted by a CGI alligator – the group begins to realise the implications of their online actions, and the dark motivations of the people providing their luxury flight.

Most of Panic Button takes place in one location: the fancy private jet flying our cast of characters to NYC. Director Chris Crow, who made an impressive debut with twisted-slasher Devil’s Bridge, makes the most of the limited space, the claustrophobia mounting as the film ticks by. Luckily, the main cast of four more than withstand the gruelling close-ups and twisting narrative. Scarlett Alice Johnson makes for a strong lead as single mother Jo, while Elen Rhys is suitably wide-eyed as sweet girl Gwen. Jack Gordon’s Max is the most superficially likeable character, but it’s Michael Jibson who steals the show as Dave, the smartly-dressed but grossly laddish, irritating prick of a character that you’d definitely not want to be stuck on a plane with. He’s the kind of character whose demise you hope for, but for a change Dave’s an annoying character who is at least nuanced and intended to be that way. A large number of recent slasher films and survival films tend to be populated by unlikeable, two-dimensional characters. Although Panic Button’s unwitting victims are fairly obvious stereotypes, they’re at least likeable and well-developed. Even brilliantly-annoying Dave has his moments of sympathy. If not for this great sense of character, the film could easily have been a prosaic thriller.

Contributing to this is the tight script, the discussions about the clunky topic of social networking never coming across as anything but natural. It’s easy to treat a topic such as social networking, particularly when considering the more troubling side of the phenomenon, in an awkward way: the way social commentators might talk is entirely different to how every day users of networks like All2Gethr.com would talk about status updates and poking. Panic Button’s strong sense of character is what really keeps it together, as the narrative becomes increasingly twisty and verges on the over-blown – however, it never quite tips over that line into the realm of the unbelievable. The film is tense throughout, and the device of the creepy animated alligator character controlling events is surprisingly effective. It shouldn’t work, but it does, mostly thanks to Joshua Richards’ commanding, booming voice work. The melding of psychological horror with the topicality of the dark side of the internet is fairly seamless, matters such as cyber-bullying and voyeurism never seeming to be shoe-horned in for the sake of it. What’s key to this success is that the online actions of characters – from watching snuff videos to pretending to be someone they’re not – are never presented in a particularly sensationalist manner, and creepiest of all are the moments when you stop and think: ‘hey, I do that…’!

Panic Button is a breath of fresh air, a modern, original twist on a familiar narrative form. Keeping up an impressively tense atmosphere, this is a film that thrills as it makes you think. With upcoming festival screenings at FrightFest in August, and Abertoir in November (where you can also see director Chris Crow’s debut, Devil’s Bridge), Panic Button is home-grown horror worth seeking out.